MR. EPSTEIN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
30
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employee |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employment |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Employee |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Gift giver receiver |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein charged federally in New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's activities and Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement, particularly r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein potentially helping Maxwell help the Clintons in the context of the Clin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for Mr. Epstein's plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period when Ghislaine Maxwell was 'general manager' for Epstein, and questions arise about lists ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawyer for Ms. Maxwell mentioned Mr. Dershowitz was among people Epstein directed to have sex with. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Brief encounter between Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz at Epstein's New York mansion. | Mr. Epstein's mansion in Ne... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz frequently seen with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein allowed Mr. Dershowitz to use his bedroom. | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz visited Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home 4-5 times a year, staying 2-3 days. | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz received a massage at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house, stated the masseuse was not ... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's wealth, business, and assets (planes, island, New Mexico ranch). | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016188.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of Mr. Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski testifies that he met Mr. Epstein in 1991 and was hired as a captain and licensed aircraft mechanic for his private planes. He states that between 1994 and 2004, he flew Mr. Epstein approximately every four days, primarily transporting him between his various homes.
DOJ-OGR-00015517.jpg
This document consists of four telephone message slips from July 2004 and other unspecified dates. The messages are for 'JE', 'SARAH', and 'MR. EPSTEIN' from callers including 'GLEN DUBIN', 'Zorro-', and two redacted individuals. The topics of the messages include a flight cancellation for someone named George, a request for a return call, a question about taking a taxi, and an update on a technical repair.
DOJ-OGR-00015198.jpg
This is page 17 of a legal document titled 'Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories' from a case involving a plaintiff versus 'Epstein, et al.'. In response to Interrogatory #20, which asks for the identification of any males besides Mr. Epstein who committed lewd acts against the plaintiff since age 10, the plaintiff's sworn answer is 'None'. The document is marked as subject to a protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00015197.jpg
This legal document contains a plaintiff's answers to interrogatories in a case against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff states she was introduced to Epstein in 2002 by a friend to provide massages, which she did until August 2003. She details payments and gifts received from Epstein, including $200-$300 per session, $500 for a photo taken by Sarah Kellen, concert tickets, and other items.
DOJ-OGR-00001955.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where an attorney argues for their client, likely concerning bail. The attorney refutes the government's claim that the client is a flight risk by distinguishing the current case from precedents like 'U.S. v. Zarger' and a prior case involving a 'Mr. Epstein', emphasizing that their client was in New Hampshire at the time of arrest and not making plans to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00001929.jpg
This document is page 52 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The defense attorney is arguing for the client's release on strict conditions, refuting the government's claim that the client is a flight risk or has been 'hiding out.' The attorney highlights that the client has been actively litigating civil cases since 2015 and denying impropriety regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001908.jpg
This page captures a dialogue between the Court and Ms. Moe regarding a bail determination. The Judge asks how to distinguish between the defendant hiding to evade authorities versus hiding to avoid press notoriety related to the Epstein case. Ms. Moe argues that regardless of the motive, the facts demonstrate the defendant's ability and willingness to live in hiding.
DOJ-OGR-00030601.jpg
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness describes their professional relationship with Elaine Maxwell, identifying her as their direct boss and the manager of all of Mr. Epstein's worldwide households. The witness also confirms that Ms. Maxwell was Mr. Epstein's girlfriend.
DOJ-OGR-00030566.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing an interview with Mr. John Alessi. Alessi recounts a phone call he made to Jeffrey Epstein, during which Epstein confirmed he was the subject of an investigation and had hired his own private investigator. The conversation underscores the ongoing and confidential nature of the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030564.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. The witness describes being contacted and questioned by an investigator from attorney Roy Black's office regarding an unspecified matter. The witness also recounts a brief, uninformative conversation with a man named John about an ongoing investigation, which occurred after the witness found a 'card' that scared them.
DOJ-OGR-00021476.jpg
This document details how prosecutor Villafaña and other federal agents handled communications with Jeffrey Epstein's victims regarding a non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Fearing that knowledge of potential monetary damages could compromise witness credibility, Villafaña deliberately withheld specific details about the NPA from victims during interviews in 2007 and 2008. The text contrasts the official explanation given to victims with the reality of the agreement, as later attested to by victim Courtney Wild.
DOJ-OGR-00021418.jpg
This legal document page from April 2021 details events from December 2007 related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It focuses on the decision by the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO), led by Acosta, to defer to the State Attorney's Office on the matter of notifying victims about Epstein's state court proceedings. The text includes a quote from a proposed communication outlining this deference and Acosta's subsequent explanation to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) that he trusted the state to fulfill its legal obligations to victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021417.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing internal communications within the USAO and negotiations with Epstein's defense team in December 2007. It highlights the conflict regarding victim notification, with prosecutor Villafaña expressing frustration about a 'Catch 22' situation where she felt unable to notify victims or file federal charges. The text also details draft letters sent to US Attorney Acosta and State Attorney Krischer, and meetings with defense attorneys Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz attempting to limit federal involvement.
DOJ-OGR-00021414.jpg
This legal document details a dispute between the prosecution (represented by Sloman, Villafaña, and Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Starr and Lefkowitz) regarding the government's obligation to notify victims under the VRRA. The prosecution argues for the necessity of informing victims about Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and his upcoming state plea deal, scheduled for December 14, 2007, while the defense objects strongly. The document includes excerpts from letters exchanged between the two sides, outlining their legal positions and the specifics of the proposed plea agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00021403.jpg
This legal document details a professional conflict between two government attorneys, Villafaña and Menchel, over plea negotiations in the case of Mr. Epstein. Villafaña accused Menchel, her superior, of violating victims' rights by not consulting them, while Menchel defended his discretionary authority and criticized Villafaña's actions and judgment. The document reveals that on the same day Villafaña criticized Menchel, she herself contacted the defense (Sanchez) about a potential resolution without first speaking to the victims, highlighting the complexities and differing interpretations of prosecutorial obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00021401.jpg
This legal document details investigator Villafaña's account of her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein's victims regarding the resolution of the federal case. Villafaña reported to OPR that victims had varied opinions, with many not wanting to testify or have Epstein prosecuted due to fears about privacy, safety, and public disclosure. Declarations from 2017 by both Villafaña and an FBI case agent corroborate that victims expressed significant concerns and did not uniformly push for prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00021316.jpg
This legal document details concerns from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO), voiced by an individual named Villafaña, regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release arrangement in Palm Beach County. Villafaña alleges that Epstein's lawyers schemed to make him eligible and that his application contained significant inaccuracies, such as listing a foundation with his lawyer's phone number as his employer. The document also notes a potential conflict of interest where Epstein paid thousands of dollars per week to off-duty sheriff's deputies for protection, seemingly in violation of work release rules.
DOJ-OGR-00021305.jpg
This legal document details communications from February and March 2008 between federal prosecutors (Acosta, Sloman, Oosterbaan) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Starr). The central conflict involves the scope of the CEOS section's review of the case, with the defense pushing for broader involvement from senior Department of Justice officials and expressing distrust in prosecutor Drew Oosterbaan. The prosecution team expresses frustration with the defense's tactics and concerns about delays, while internal communications reveal doubts about offering Epstein a plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00021288.jpg
This document details the legal wrangling in October 2007 regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights the friction between government attorneys (Villafaña, Sloman) and defense counsel (Lefkowitz, Sanchez) over the interpretation of victim compensation procedures (§ 2255) and the role of a special master. Notably, Villafaña expresses frustration with the defense's attempts to limit victim lawsuits, at one point asking her supervisor, "Can I please just indict him?"
DOJ-OGR-00021279.jpg
This legal document details plea negotiations in the case against Mr. Epstein on and around September 21, 2007. It reveals intense back-and-forth communication between prosecutors (Acosta, Villafaña, Lourie) and defense attorneys (Lefkowitz, Sanchez) over critical terms, including whether Epstein would have to register as a sex offender and the scope of a non-prosecution agreement for his alleged co-conspirators. The document highlights internal prosecution strategies and their dismissive view of some members of Epstein's legal team.
DOJ-OGR-00021273.jpg
This legal document details a critical point in plea negotiations for Mr. Epstein. After prosecutor Lourie believed he had reached an agreement with defense counsel Jay Lefkowitz, Lefkowitz submitted a revised proposal with substantially different terms, including a shorter sentence and protections for Epstein's assistants. This new proposal caused frustration among the prosecutors and was ultimately rejected by the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO).
DOJ-OGR-00021242.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that quotes a lengthy email from an individual named Menchel to a recipient identified in a footnote as Sloman. In the email, Menchel severely criticizes Sloman for acting without authorization in the investigation of Mr. Epstein, specifically for preparing an indictment memo and misleading agents. Menchel also clarifies that his own conversation with Lilly Sanchez about the case was an informal exploratory discussion, not a formal plea offer, and was conducted with the full knowledge of the US Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00019572.jpg
This legal document, dated August 24, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues for the continued sealing of certain court documents, with redactions, to protect Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial from pretrial publicity. The filing references the government's own public statements about its ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's associates as evidence of the high-profile nature of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019221.jpg
This document is a page from a legal testimony transcript filed on July 2, 2020. An unidentified witness denies being aware of Mr. Epstein having sexual activities with anyone other than themselves and two other women (a "blond and brunette") during their encounters in the 1990s and 2000s. The witness also explicitly denies ever giving a massage to anyone, including Mr. Epstein and an individual referred to as "Minor Victim-2".
DOJ-OGR-00019112.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' 30-year employment with Mr. Epstein, establishing that Rodgers never witnessed any behavior from Ghislaine that suggested she was helping Epstein abuse underage girls. Rodgers also confirms he was comfortable with his own teenage daughter spending time with Ghislaine.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Epstein purchased a travel ticket for the witne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Unnamed School | $0.00 | Attorney Menninger notes that a form lists Mr. ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | The Family / The ... | $0.00 | Financial assistance/guarantor for school admis... | View |
| N/A | Received | Les | MR. EPSTEIN | $100,000,000.00 | Les Wexner theoretically owed Mr. Epstein $100 ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane Doe Number 3 | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Underage females | $200.00 | Payment for sexual massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money accepted for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots for Ms. Farmer. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane / Profession... | $0.00 | The Court notes testimony indicating Epstein wa... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Bruce Rinehart | $0.00 | Rinehart 'appeared to be being paid by Mr. Epst... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Theft of cash (band of hundred dollar bills) fr... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of boots. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Airline/Vendor | $0.00 | Purchase of a plane ticket to fly to New York. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Discussion of potential college tuition payment... | View |
| 2025-12-01 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Plaintiff (unnamed) | $0.00 | Settlement of a suit | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | THE COURT | $0.00 | Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... | View |
| 2007-05-08 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jim Eisenberg | $0.00 | Payment for attorney services for a subpoenaed ... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Unknown | MR. EPSTEIN | $0.00 | Purchase of Bell helicopter | View |
Phone Call
A message was left for MR. EPSTEIN from LES & JESS. No time was specified. The 'TELEPHONED' box was checked, but no written message was included.
Unknown
Message starting 'for Mr. Epstein' located in upper right-hand corner of Exhibit 1B.
Call notification
wants you to know that he called.
Availability
Will Be available At This Number For 30 min Otherwise Tomorrow 9 AM To 1:00 PM
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity