This document is a page from a Table of Contents and Table of Authorities for a legal filing related to the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It outlines legal arguments regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the Torture Victim Protection Act, and negligence claims against defendants alleged to have materially supported al-Qaeda, specifically mentioning 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank) and 'Sovereign Defendants.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production, likely related to investigations into financial networks supporting terrorism.
This document is page 85 of a legal analysis (likely a law review article) produced for the House Oversight Committee (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014064). It argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before formal charges are filed, specifically criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) restrictive interpretation that rights only attach post-charging. The text cites the Attorney General Guidelines and legislative intent from Senator Kyl to support the view that victims are owed fairness and consultation during the plea negotiation phase, even before a case is brought.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity