| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bill Gates
|
Participant example |
6
|
1 |
This document is a printed email from November 22, 2021, questioning the inclusion of Elizabeth Loftus in an unspecified group or event ('the table'). The sender argues against her inclusion based on her alleged knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein and her position on the board of the EDGE Foundation, providing a link to her bio on the EDGE website.
This document discusses the role of extreme wealth and philanthropy, arguing that billionaires like Bill Gates fill gaps left by government inaction and that the U.S. benefits from a lack of entrenched hereditary wealth compared to Europe. It also addresses AI and society, emphasizing the importance of monitoring data inputs rather than just the technology itself, and draws a parallel between AI algorithms and government bureaucracies regarding the need for better oversight.
Forensic log of an iMessage conversation from March 17, 2017, between 'jee' (using jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual (associated with phone number 12063827848). They discuss advising 'bill' (likely Bill Gates) on how to handle government budget cuts, suggesting he use a 'Giant DAF' (Donor Advised Fund) or the 'Giving Pledge' network to replace lost funding. The conversation references the political climate ('world of the strongmen') and specific budget focuses like veterans and mental health.
This document appears to be a fragment of an email chain (indicated by '>>' markers) bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023457. It contains a quoted excerpt from the German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung praising 'EDGE' (likely the Edge Foundation) for its work connecting science and literary cultures. The quote highlights that based on algorithms by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, EDGE's website ranks highly compared to The New York Times and eBay.
In this March 2018 email exchange, Robert Trivers writes to David Haig and Jeffrey Epstein offering to add them to a mailing list associated with Gordon Getty ('Gruterites'). Trivers uses the email to harshly critique John Brockman's EDGE organization while effusively praising Haig as a geneticist and Epstein as a 'financial/mathematical mind of exceptional quality.' David Haig replies the next morning, politely declining the invitation to join the mailing list.
This is an email from Robert Trivers to David Haig and Jeffrey Epstein dated March 19, 2018. Trivers informs them he plans to add them to a mailing list associated with Gordon Getty ('Gruterites') unless they object, while simultaneously criticizing John Brockman and the EDGE program. The email serves to introduce Haig and Epstein to one another, praising Haig as a top geneticist and Epstein as having an exceptional financial and mathematical mind.
This page (140) from a House Oversight document (stamped 016360) appears to be a transcript or essay discussing the societal impacts of 'Extreme Wealth' and 'AI and Society.' The speaker defends billionaire philanthropy, specifically citing Bill Gates, the Ford Foundation, and the Sloan Foundation as entities filling gaps left by the government. The text also contrasts US wealth mobility favorably against European hereditary wealth and argues for a data-centric approach to regulating Artificial Intelligence, drawing an analogy between AI algorithms and government bureaucracies.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity