Mr. Everdell argues that the jury, not the court, should determine which sentencing guidelines (2003 or 2004) apply, due to implications of the Ex Post Facto Clause.
An unnamed speaker objects to a proposed method of presenting evidence, arguing it's more appropriate for a closing argument and that the witness, Mr. Buscemi, cannot be properly cross-examined.
Ms. Moe defends the proposal to use a witness to present evidence to avoid awkwardness and questions the objection to showing the jury evidence they haven't seen yet.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity