| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
16
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Scott Denett
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Stephanie Clifford
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jefffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator potential |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeannine Jeskewitz
|
Professional coordinating |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Margaux Rogers
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Green
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ed Boyden
|
Professional scheduling |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kelly Friendly
|
Network correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jefffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-04-03 | N/A | An email discussion occurred between Jeffrey Epstein, his associates (Lesley Groff, Darren Indyke... | N/A (Virtual) | View |
| 2011-03-08 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein forwards a Vanity Fair article about himself to Lesley Groff, who replies. | N/A | View |
| 2009-09-18 | N/A | Unsealing of the nine-page federal non-prosecution agreement. | Federal Court | View |
| 2000-01-01 | Flight coordination | The witness (Rodgers) describes speaking to different people, specifically Epstein's secretary, t... | N/A | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Flight scheduling protocols involving Lesley Groff. | Unknown | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Flight Scheduling | New York Office (remote con... | View |
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
This document details various accommodations and financial assistance provided by Jeffrey (Epstein) to his employees and their family members. Examples include tuition payments for children, medical support, and flexible work arrangements, illustrating his alleged generosity and support for his staff's well-being and educational pursuits.
This document page discusses the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically detailing Epstein's plea agreement and the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) that protected potential co-conspirators. It also introduces the indictment against Maxwell, outlining the specific counts and statutes related to conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts.
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining sentencing timelines, gain time restrictions, and confidentiality clauses for Epstein. It explicitly states that in exchange for his guilty plea, the United States will not prosecute named potential co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova) and will suspend the federal Grand Jury investigation.
This legal document page details the terms of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which included an eighteen-month sentence and a provision that the United States would not prosecute his potential co-conspirators, specifically naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document then transitions to discussing the indictment filed against Maxwell, outlining that it contained eight counts, with six proceeding to trial, and provides footnotes detailing the specific charges related to sex trafficking and conspiracy.
This document is a page from a plea agreement involving Epstein, detailing sentencing timelines and conditions regarding 'gain time' during incarceration in Florida. It outlines confidentiality expectations and stipulates that if Epstein fulfills the agreement, the United States will not prosecute named co-conspirators and will suspend federal Grand Jury investigations.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The testimony establishes the protocol for scheduling flights during the 1990s and 2000s: Rodgers only coordinated directly with Ghislaine when she was a passenger; otherwise, he coordinated with Epstein's secretaries. The testimony specifically identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary who handled these duties in the 2000s.
This document is page 16 of a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by executors Indyke and Kahn), dated June 3, 2020. The text alleges that Jeffrey Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, and claims these photos are currently held by the federal government. It is signed by attorney Robert S. Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP.
This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It lists specific interactions Jane Doe had with Epstein's associates between 1994 and 1999, identifying Ghislaine Maxwell, Juan Alessi, Darren Indyke, Adam Perry Lang, Lesley Groff, Mark Epstein, and Sarah Kellen. The response details roles these individuals played, ranging from facilitating abuse and meetings to providing transportation and making threatening financial demands.
This page discusses the legal proceedings involving Epstein and Maxwell, detailing Epstein's plea agreement and the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) protecting his co-conspirators. It outlines the indictment against Maxwell, which included eight counts, and provides footnotes referencing specific Florida statutes and federal charges related to sex trafficking and conspiracy.
This legal document page outlines the terms of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein, in which the United States agreed not to prosecute potential co-conspirators, specifically naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document then introduces the indictment against Maxwell, detailing the multiple federal charges she faced, including conspiracy, enticement of a minor, and sex trafficking.
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated September 2024) summarizing the history of the Epstein and Maxwell cases. It details Epstein's Florida plea deal (NPA), specifically quoting the clause that granted immunity to potential co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. It also outlines the specific legal counts brought against Ghislaine Maxwell in her federal indictment, including conspiracy to entice minors and sex trafficking conspiracy.
This court transcript excerpt details the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding flight scheduling procedures. The witness confirms that in the 1990s, they would coordinate with Ghislaine if she was flying, or otherwise with one of Epstein's secretaries. The witness then identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary in the 2000s with whom they would have coordinated.
This document is page 34 of a legal filing (Document 204) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330), filed on April 16, 2021. It discusses the legal interpretation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically rejecting the defendant's argument that the NPA binds the entire federal government rather than just the Southern District of Florida. The text quotes the specific NPA section granting immunity to potential co-conspirators, explicitly naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova.
This document is page 5 of a Non-Prosecution Agreement/Plea Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines sentencing deadlines (late 2007/early 2008), attempts to keep the agreement out of the public record, and crucially grants immunity from federal criminal charges to four named potential co-conspirators: Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. It also suspends pending federal Grand Jury investigations and subpoenas conditional on Epstein's compliance.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on Visoski's interactions with Sarah Kellen, establishing her role in scheduling flights in the 2000s and attempting to pinpoint the date of her first flight on one of Epstein's planes, suggested to be September 2001.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski (likely a pilot or aviation manager). The testimony confirms that Ghislaine Maxwell and Lesley Groff (Epstein's secretary) were responsible for contacting the witness to schedule flights on Epstein's plane. The witness specifically recalls calling Groff at the New York main office number: 212-750-9895.
This page is a critical excerpt from Jeffrey Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It outlines the sentencing timeline (late 2007) and specifically grants federal immunity to Epstein's 'potential co-conspirators,' explicitly naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document also stipulates that the agreement was intended to remain confidential and details the suspension of the federal Grand Jury investigation.
On May 23, 2011, Lesley Groff forwarded an email marked 'High' importance to Jeffrey Epstein (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com). The original email was a 'Dear Friend' newsletter from host Mark Green celebrating the first anniversary of the radio show 'Both Sides Now' featuring Arianna Huffington and Mary Matalin. The content discusses political topics including the 'Jobs Agenda', Medicare, and a commentary on powerful men 'abusing the help' citing Strauss-Kahn, Schwarzenegger, and Ensign.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, originating with a Reuters reporter, David Ingram, contacting attorney Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email was forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein, and subsequently by Epstein to Lesley Groff, who responded with concern ('so sorry...'). Portions of the email chain between Weinberg and Epstein are redacted under privilege.
An email chain from November 28, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation') and Jean Huguen (of Alberto Pinto). Epstein requests a one-week delay for a trip, explicitly stating that 'trump related issues' are occupying his time. Huguen replies proposing to reschedule a visit to 'works from Plant' and a meeting to mid-December.
Forwarding the discussion with Robert Kuhn.
Relaying invitation for dinner from Tim Zagat, his schedule in NY vs the country, his recent trip to Paris, and a mention of a dream about Trump.
States that at the moment, 'we' will go to 'Ish' on Sunday the 26th early, then to New York for the week. He mentions that the group will be a redacted person, himself, and 'larry', and notes that 'trump is in town that week'.
Asks Jeffrey E., 'Will you want to bring back [REDACTED] or [REDACTED] for the week you are in NY?'.
Asks Jeffrey E., 'Will you want to bring back [REDACTED] or [REDACTED] for the week you are in NY?'.
States that at the moment, 'we' will go to 'Ish' on Sunday the 26th early, then to New York for the week. He mentions that the group will be a redacted person, himself, and 'larry', and notes that 'trump is in town that week'.
A one-word response: 'no'.
Asks Jeffrey E., 'Will you want to bring back [REDACTED] or [REDACTED] for the week you are in NY?'.
A one-word response: 'no'.
States that at the moment, 'we' will go to 'Ish' on Sunday the 26th early, then to New York for the week. He mentions that the group will be a redacted person, himself, and 'larry', and notes that 'trump is in town that week'.
A one-word response: 'no'.
Forwarding thread to assistant.
call patrick in new york if nec se if he knows jerome
Trying to get appointment for Lasma with Jerome. Phillipe not responding/voicemail full.
Update on booking attempt. Patrick had John call. Credit card given. Appointment unsuccessful due to busy season. Trump's presence causing traffic mentioned as potential reason for cancellations.
Jeffrey Epstein forwards the entire email exchange about rescheduling the trip to Lesley Groff.
Forwarding an email containing an article by Larry Summers.
ok... so sorry...
Forwarding the chain to Groff.
Informing Joi that Jeffrey is canceling his Vancouver trip suddenly to fly to Washington, DC.
Forwarding the conversation to his assistant.
I'd like to speak to her
did you want to send the below to Lisa? (or have me ask her?)
Do you know Chomsky , he Is with me
Instruction to print copies for Leon to review line by line.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity