country
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00034725.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 25, 2019, between attorney Aida Leisenring and MCC New York staff. Leisenring requests the preservation of video surveillance (hallway and body camera footage) surrounding inmate Tartaglione's cell from the night of July 22-23, 2019, specifically citing the 'Epstein incident' under investigation. MCC staff confirm the preservation of footage for the SHU tier containing cell Z06-215.
EFTA00030715.pdf
A chain of emails from late August 2019 between attorney Bruce Barket and officials from the US Attorney's Office and MCC New York regarding inmate Nicholas Tartaglione ('Nick'). The discussions focus on requests for social visits with his parents, which MCC restricts based on policy and disciplinary sanctions, allowing them only for mitigation purposes in capital cases. The emails also confirm a legal meeting with Tartaglione on August 28, 2019.
EFTA00030552.pdf
An email chain from November 2019 between defense attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Barket requests statements made by inmate Nicholas Tartaglione and video footage regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. The US Attorney's Office agrees to produce Tartaglione's statements but explicitly denies the request for the suicide attempt video and reports, claiming they are not relevant to the case.
EFTA00029704.pdf
This document is an email thread from March 3, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and an official (likely at the MCC prison). Barket inquires if his client, 'Nick' (likely Nicholas Tartaglione), will be allowed to appear in court the following day despite the MCC being on lockdown for a week, citing the 'inhumanity' of the 24/7 lockdown. The official responds briefly confirming that they are still producing inmates for court.
EFTA00021695.pdf
This document contains an email chain from September 20-21, 2019, between defense attorney Bruce Barket, 'Learned Counsel' Tony Ricco (Tonyricco), and redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys. They are discussing scheduling a meeting to propose a briefing schedule for 'penalty phase pleadings,' likely in a capital case. While the law firm name contains 'Epstein,' this refers to a partner at the firm, though Bruce Barket is known for representing Nicholas Tartaglione, Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate.
EFTA00019694.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 20-21, 2019, primarily involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP, and an Assistant United States Attorney. The discussion concerns scheduling a meeting to propose a briefing schedule. The AUSA suggests meeting 'next Friday' to allow time for internal discussion and conferring with a redacted party.
EFTA00019647.pdf
This document is an internal email thread dated September 22, 2020, between government officials (likely FBI/DOJ). It concerns a 'Civilian Crime Report Submission' that purports to relate to Jeffrey Epstein. The officials state that because the submission originated from a foreign country, they will not respond to it, but they instruct a colleague to log the submission.
EFTA00019063.pdf
An email chain from February 24, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and DOJ officials regarding a scheduling conflict for a status conference involving Mr. Tartaglione (likely Nicholas Tartaglione, Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate). Barket informs the prosecution that his request for a day off from a trial in the EDNY was denied, complicating his attendance at the Tartaglione conference where a 'Curcio issue' is to be addressed. The DOJ officials discuss consulting with 'Bobbi' before responding.
EFTA00018546.pdf
An email thread from February 2020 between attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Barket discusses scheduling conflicts regarding a status conference for his client, Mr. Tartaglione (Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate), due to a trial in the EDNY. The correspondence mentions a 'Curcio issue' related to the case.
EFTA00015994.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2019 between attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a discovery request for statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. While the USANYS agreed to produce reports of Tartaglione's statements, they explicitly refused to produce reports and video of the attempted suicide itself, deeming them irrelevant to the current case.
EFTA00015932.pdf
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Michael Bachrach and Bruce Barket) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The attorneys are requesting records of statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's reported suicide attempt on July 22-23, 2019. The defense argues this is 'Rule 16' discovery material relevant to a 'penalty phase' (likely Tartaglione's capital case), while the government discusses the procedural requirements (Touhy regulations vs. Rule 16).
EFTA00005848.pdf
This document is a printout of a 'COLLECT' (Connecticut On-Line Law Enforcement Communications Teleprocessing) person query result dated July 2, 2019. It displays driver's license information for a female subject (name redacted) living in New Canaan, CT, describing her as 5'3" with blue eyes. The document indicates a valid Class D license expiring in October 2020; the final four pages of the file are completely redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00000201.tif
This document is an 'Interest of Amici' section, likely from a legal brief, detailing the role and mission of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). It describes NACDL as a nonprofit professional bar association founded in 1958, dedicated to ensuring justice and due process for criminal defendants and advancing the fair administration of justice, with a nationwide membership including various legal professionals. The document also includes a disclaimer regarding the authorship and funding of the brief pursuant to Supreme Court Rules.
DOJ-OGR-00017746.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal cross-examination dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as Jane. Jane discusses her knowledge of the 'Epstein case' and clarifies that she hired a lawyer due to ongoing harassment, including calls to her, her husband, her work, and her friends, rather than solely based on information from tabloids. She also mentions having traveled frequently to a northern country during her teenage years.
DOJ-OGR-00008484.jpg
This document is page 28 of a court filing (Document 562) dated December 17, 2021, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 20 regarding Count Four: Transportation of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity. The text defines the legal requirements for proving Ms. Maxwell knowingly transported the victim 'Jane' across state lines or internationally, noting that personal transportation is not required if she made the arrangements (e.g., buying tickets) and that the victim's consent is irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00001077.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021) recording an argument against granting bail to the defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell). The speaker argues that the defendant has been untruthful about her finances, claiming ignorance of her own wealth ('millions of dollars'), and poses a flight risk involving potential foreign travel documents. The prosecution explicitly compares her situation to the case of Jeffrey Epstein, citing Judge Berman's decision to deny Epstein bail based on flight risk and dangerousness.
DOJ-OGR-00000527.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, during a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein. Prosecutor Rossmiller argues against bail, citing Epstein's extensive foreign connections and the discovery of an expired 1980s passport issued by a foreign country with a residence listed as Saudi Arabia. The passport contained Epstein's photo but a different name, which the prosecution uses to argue flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00002247.jpg
This page from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues against granting bail to Ghislaine Maxwell, citing her lack of US employment ties, significant foreign connections, and flight risk. The text details her history of providing 'incomplete or erroneous' financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically noting a July 2020 incident where she underreported assets at $3.5 million and misrepresented her ownership status of a New Hampshire property. It references a report by the accounting firm Macalvins intended to clarify her finances.
DOJ-OGR-00002234(1).jpg
This document is page 2 of a Court Opinion and Order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, citing flight risk, substantial resources, foreign citizenship in a non-extradition country, and lack of candor regarding finances. It outlines the background of the case, including the June 2020 indictment for facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors and the Defendant's subsequent arrest in New Hampshire.
DOJ-OGR-00002217(1).jpg
This legal document is part of a defense argument for Ms. Maxwell's bail application. The defense counters the government's assertion that she is a flight risk by highlighting a proposed 'substantial bail package' backed by her, her spouse, and co-signers, which would create severe financial consequences for them if she were to flee. The document also refutes the government's characterization of Ms. Maxwell as an expert at hiding and clarifies financial details regarding her spouse's assets.
DOJ-OGR-00031717.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page from July 2005, showing a series of comments left for the user 'suomenome'. The comments vary widely, including a personal update from a user named Billy who is waiting to 'ship out', a cryptic message stating 'This is bad news bears', and two separate comments simply referencing 'WEED'. The document includes a Department of Justice Bates number, indicating it is part of an official record.
DOJ-OGR-00002974.jpg
This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein was strictly limited to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). It cites a 2013 brief from the USAO-SDFL, an OPR Report, and Department of Justice guidelines to establish that the USAO-SDFL did not have the authority to, and did not intend to, prevent Epstein's prosecution in any other federal district. The central theme is that the NPA was not a 'global resolution' and did not provide nationwide immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00031126.jpg
This document is a transcript of a conversation. The speaker describes going upstairs and seeing a picture of someone in a different country, a large bathroom, and a pink and green couch. They also mention someone making a phone call during a massage.
DOJ-OGR-00005116.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.
DOJ-OGR-00033127.jpg
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a legal deposition or transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words alphabetically from 'cases' to 'Country' alongside their page and line numbers in the source transcript. Key terms include 'Connolly' (referenced multiple times), 'civil', 'complaint', 'coaching', and 'CF09454AXX' (likely a case number). The document is part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) processed by the DOJ.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity