District of Utah

Location
Mentions
8
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

022.pdf

This document is a legal motion filed on November 23, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD). Attorney Bradley J. Edwards requests the court to admit Paul G. Cassell (a member of the Utah Bar) to appear pro hac vice as co-counsel for the plaintiff, identified as M.J., in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document documents the payment of a $75 admission fee and lists the defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein from the firm Fowler White Burnett PA.

Legal motion (motion for limited appearance/pro hac vice)
2025-12-26

DOJ-OGR-00000687.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court hearing on September 3, 2019, where Paul Cassell, a law professor and former federal judge, addresses the court. He commends the judge's handling of victim impact statements and strongly urges the judge to publish their remarks as a formal opinion to promote transparency and set a legal precedent, referencing a case he wrote about, U.S. v. Heaton.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002164.jpg

This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 18, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases, dating from 1985 to 2019, that are cited as legal precedent in the main document. The cases cover various federal districts and circuits, with a significant number originating from courts in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017750.jpg

This page from a law review article discusses the rights of crime victims to access presentence reports under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to ensure accurate restitution. The author recounts their testimony before the Sentencing Commission and counters arguments from the Practitioners' Advisory Group, which opposed victim access to these reports. The text argues that legislative history supports broad rights for victims to be heard and informed.

Legal law review article / legal document page
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity