| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Academic alignment |
5
|
1 |
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2022, argues against applying the sentencing guideline ยง 4B1.5 to Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that the guideline is intended only for recidivist sex offenders who pose a continuing danger to the public, which they claim Ms. Maxwell is not. Applying the guideline would allegedly contradict the intent of Congress and the Sentencing Commission, improperly add over 10 years to her sentence, and lead to an absurd result.
This document is page 4 of a 29-page legal filing (Document 662) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 15, 2022. It is a table of authorities listing various court cases, statutes such as the 'Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of 1998', and other sources like the Merriam-Webster dictionary and United States Sentencing Guidelines. The page numbers where these authorities are cited within the main document are also provided.
This document is a forensic extraction log of digital messages from June 17, 2018, bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The conversation is primarily driven by the email address 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (often associated with Hunter Biden in oversight documents) and a redacted sender. The conversation involves brief, casual exchanges including typos ('epci' for 'epic'), references to 'putting the spell on him,' and a political/religious comment stating the 'Pope is wrong on policy.'
This document is a Table of Contents page from a manuscript or book, bearing the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015038'. The content appears to be a collection of satirical or counter-culture essays (resembling the work of Paul Krassner) covering topics such as religion, presidential sex lives, and subcultures. It lists chapter titles referencing figures like Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky, and Sarah Palin.
This document is a log of digital messages from June 22, 2018, primarily sent by 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an account linked to Jeffrey Epstein). The messages describe a tense encounter with 'mooch' (likely Anthony Scaramucci) in an office building, mention an associate named Miro, and express frustration with performing for 'pols' (politicians). The conversation concludes with a redacted sender joking about making the Pope a nemesis, to which the primary sender replies with a nihilistic reference to the movie 'The Wild Bunch'.
This document is page 39 of a larger file labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021285', containing a list of academic endnotes (numbered 14-29). The citations reference works in sociobiology, evolutionary psychology, theology, and philosophy, including prominent authors such as E.O. Wilson, Richard Dawkins, John Cacioppo, Thomas Aquinas, Aristotle, and Kant. While no direct narrative text links to Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page, the content reflects the high-level academic and scientific interests often associated with Epstein's funding activities (particularly evolutionary biology).
This document is page 37 of an academic or theological paper found within the House Oversight Committee's files. The text discusses the intersection of theology (Aquinas, Aristotle) and evolutionary psychology (Cacioppo) regarding 'kin altruism' and Christian love. The author argues for a 'Christian humanism' that integrates scientific understanding of human nature with theological concepts, contrasting this view with the theological positions of Nygren.
This document appears to be page 157 of a philosophical essay or manuscript included in House Oversight evidence files. The text discusses the concept of 'Network Power,' 'Gatekeepers,' and 'Gatelands,' arguing that modern power lies in controlling protocols and access to networks (financial, biological, digital) rather than physical territory. It draws comparisons to Cecil Rhodes and historical empires while analyzing the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in a connected world.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity