United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to non prosecution agreement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Entered into non prosecution agreement npa |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | Appeal addressing five questions regarding Maxwell's prosecution and sentence | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution and plea agreement (NPA) with the United States At... | Southern District of Florida | View |
017.pdf
This document is a Motion to File Under Seal submitted by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen on July 25, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe v. Epstein et al. The defendants request to seal their 'motion for stay' to protect a confidential agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The document includes certificates of compliance and service, noting that the plaintiff opposes the motion, and lists the legal counsel representing all parties involved.
001.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on April 17, 2009, by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff alleges that in 2003, when she was a 17-year-old high school student, she was recruited and transported to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was sexually assaulted under the guise of giving massages. The complaint asserts causes of action under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 regarding coercion, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking, and transport of child pornography.
EFTA00030569.pdf
This document is a formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 22 specific discovery requests made on October 13, 2020. The government addresses requests for Epstein's diary, the 'Billionaires Playboy Club' manuscript, flight logs (implied in broader requests but not itemized), and the identities of minor victims, often denying immediate production based on Rule 16 restrictions or asserting that materials have already been produced. The letter also discusses the handling of potential 'Brady' and 'Giglio' materials, stating that impeachment evidence will be produced closer to trial.
EFTA00029540.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations arguments, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges from the sex trafficking-related charges, ruling they must be tried separately to ensure a fair trial. The Court also orders the parties to negotiate a schedule for outstanding pretrial disclosures.
EFTA00028880.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting her motion to dismiss the indictment based on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Jeffrey Epstein signed in Florida. Maxwell argues that the NPA's clause immunizing 'potential co-conspirators of Epstein' explicitly covers her and bars the current prosecution in the Southern District of New York. The defense contends that the government's attempt to limit the NPA geographically (to Florida) or to specific crimes is contradicted by the plain text of the agreement and legal precedent regarding plea agreements.
EFTA00027809.pdf
This document is a 'Government's Notice of Proposed Procedures for the Determination of a Remedy' filed by the United States in the case of Jane Doe 1 & 2 v. United States. The government proposes a schedule where Petitioners must first submit their proposed remedies, followed by a 60-day period for the government to consult with victims before responding. The government argues this consultation is essential because potential remedies, such as rescinding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, could negatively impact other victims who have already received compensation or wish to avoid further trauma.
EFTA00024473.pdf
An email chain from December 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The SDNY prosecutor is requesting a 'key' to decode the 'Jane Doe' numbers assigned to victims in the prior Florida investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, noting they cannot match the numbers to names to verify if they are current witnesses. The Florida contact responds that they will look into it.
EFTA00020261.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court granted Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking-related counts to ensure a fair trial.
EFTA00014493.pdf
This document is a July 16, 2019 letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Richard Berman providing additional evidence to support Jeffrey Epstein's detention pending trial. It details suspicious wire transfers totaling $350,000 to potential co-conspirators shortly after the Miami Herald published articles about Epstein in late 2018. The letter also discloses the seizure of a foreign passport with a false name but Epstein's photo, over $70,000 in cash, and 48 loose diamonds from a safe in his Manhattan home, arguing these items demonstrate a significant flight risk.
EFTA00014169.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry or event log for a 'Conference Call re: Epstein' organized by Alex Acosta (USAFLS) on September 27, 2007. The call was scheduled for 15 minutes in 'Alex's Office'. The attendee list is completely redacted.
EFTA00014046.pdf
This document is the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein, dated September 24, 2007, along with an Addendum dated October 29, 2007. In exchange for pleading guilty to state prostitution charges and serving a recommended 18-month county jail sentence (plus probation), the federal government agreed not to prosecute Epstein for federal crimes. Crucially, the agreement grants immunity to 'potential co-conspirators' (names redacted) and stipulates that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
EFTA00014022.pdf
This document is a template letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta's office (Southern District of Florida) notifying a victim's attorney of the plea agreement involving a defendant (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein based on the June 30, 2008 plea date). The letter details that the defendant will pay for a Special Master-selected attorney, Robert Josefsberg, to represent the victim in civil claims, and that the defendant waives the right to contest liability in such suits. It also references the court case 'In re Jane Does 1 and 2'.
EFTA00013964.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2008, involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys (USAFLS) and attorney Roy Black. The AUSA initially contacted Black to discuss the 'Epstein matter,' to which Black replied he was out of town and asked for details. The AUSA then forwarded this exchange internally, suggesting the discussion relates to the 'performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement'.
EFTA00013878.pdf
A legal notification from the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) to Jeffrey Epstein following his June 30, 2008 guilty plea. The document lists 30 'Jane Doe' victims whom the government was prepared to indict Epstein for federal crimes against. It establishes that these individuals have the right to seek damages (deemed no less than $150,000) and that Epstein waives evidentiary challenges to this document being used in civil suits by these victims. It is signed by Epstein and his lawyer Roy Black.
EFTA00013765.pdf
An email dated December 11, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta regarding the distribution of victim notification letters in the Epstein case. The sender reports calling a victim's attorney to ask where to send the letter; significantly, the sender notes that this attorney is paid for by Epstein. The attorney requested the letter be sent to him and attempted to inquire about its contents, which the sender refused to disclose.
EFTA00013711.pdf
An email dated December 4, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta and others regarding the Epstein case. The email clarifies that attorney Mr. Goldberger's first name is Jack and reports that Epstein's plane has just arrived in West Palm Beach for a brief stay before a late afternoon departure. The sender also requests copies of 'final letters'.
EFTA00013696.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18, 2007, involving US Attorney Alex Acosta, attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis), and USAFLS staff. The emails discuss scheduling Jeffrey Epstein's 'change of plea' hearing, ultimately agreeing on November 20, 2007. The correspondence reveals a personal rapport between Acosta and Lefkowitz, noting a recent breakfast meeting, and discusses ensuring the date change does not impact when Epstein begins serving his sentence.
EFTA00013661.pdf
An email chain concluding with a formal letter from Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) to Alex [Acosta] (US Attorney). Lefkowitz argues against federal prosecution, claiming 'Main Justice' is not directing it and that it would be a 'novel application' of statutes. He cites witness testimony alleging women lied about their ages to Epstein and that the FBI pressured women to identify as victims. He requests a meeting to resolve the matter before a July 8 state court deadline.
EFTA00013612.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The emails discuss and finalize the text of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The addendum clarifies the process for appointing an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims and stipulates that Epstein will pay the representative's fees but is not obligated to fund contested litigation against himself.
EFTA00013532.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta dated December 7, 2007. The sender seeks approval to distribute a victim notification letter regarding the Epstein case and specifically asks if a copy should be sent to Mr. Josefsberg.
EFTA00013515.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 2007 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including references to US Attorney Alex Acosta. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically focusing on the selection of a 'Special Master' or attorney representative for the victims, the compensation limits (150k vs 50k), and language allowing for the 'veracity of the victims' claims' to be tested. The government sets a strict deadline for a deal, stating they have made their final concessions.
EFTA00013499.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.
EFTA00013472.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry record for a meeting titled 'Epstein Case' scheduled for September 7, 2007, from 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM at the West Palm Beach Office. The organizer is identified as Alex Acosta (USAFLS), referring to Alexander Acosta, the then-U.S. Attorney. The document shows the invitation was originally timestamped in August 2007, with metadata indicating the record was accessed or modified in 2015. The list of attendees is heavily redacted.
EFTA00011386.pdf
This document is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent Addendum between the United States (represented by US Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In the agreement, Epstein agrees to plead guilty to state solicitation charges and serve a recommended 30-month sentence (18 months in jail plus probation) in exchange for federal non-prosecution. Crucially, the agreement also grants immunity from federal prosecution to any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, with specific names redacted in the text.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity