Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Attorney Schmitt

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
2
Events
3
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Cosby
Professional
5
1
View
person Bill Cosby
Client
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal proceeding Cosby's deposition testimony in Constand's civil suit, where he decided not to invoke the Fifth A... N/A View
N/A Police investigation An initial investigation during which Attorney Schmitt allowed Cosby to give a statement to the p... N/A View
N/A N/A Settlement negotiation between Cosby (via Schmitt) and Constand. Unknown View

DOJ-OGR-00004858.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) referencing the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It discusses the validity of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs), specifically analyzing why Cosby's claim of immunity based on a District Attorney's promise was rejected by the Superior Court. It also cites *Commonwealth v. Stipetich* to argue that police promises cannot bind a District Attorney's office to non-prosecution agreements.

Court filing / legal brief (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae - united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004857.jpg

This legal document details the Superior Court's decision to reject Cosby's appeal for immunity from prosecution. The court ruled that any promise made by D.A. Castor was not legally binding without a formal court order, and it was unreasonable for Cosby, being represented by counsel, to rely on such an informal assurance. The court also found insufficient evidence that Cosby waived his Fifth Amendment rights in a civil deposition specifically because of Castor's promise.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search