| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Two Victims (Redacted)
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jimenez
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS Recipient
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Intelligence Assistant (IA)
|
Professional subordinate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A special agent presented a proposed SDFL indictment to a grand jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony (MM20-GJ) | Court/Legal setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors visited Florida and received binders with victim information. | Florida | View |
| 2021-09-29 | N/A | Voluntary interview of MCC Electronics Technician by OIG agents. | OIG New York Field Office | View |
| 2021-09-23 | N/A | Voluntary interview of SIS Lieutenant regarding Jeffrey Epstein's death | MCC New York | View |
| 2021-07-15 | N/A | Trial preparation meeting with AUSAs and Special Agent. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-10-16 | N/A | Epstein Briefing Call | Conference Call (303-586-43... | View |
| 2020-10-01 | N/A | Call with Special Agent regarding discovery materials for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-07-15 | N/A | Scheduled FBI phone interviews with two victims. | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-07-01 | N/A | Interview/meeting between FBI Special Agent and two victims represented by Edwards Pottinger LLC. | Unknown (likely remote/tele... | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Finalization of an FBI FD-302 report (interview summary) | FBI New York Field Office | View |
| 2019-08-18 | N/A | Special Agent from Office of the Inspector General requested a complete list of Epstein's commiss... | MCC | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | FBI Special Agent interviewed air traffic control personnel named Pat. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | FBI Special Agent called St. Thomas Jet Center to confirm handling of Epstein's helicopter; compa... | St. Thomas Jet Center (via ... | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Scheduled meeting with the Warden. | SDNY | View |
| 2019-08-09 | N/A | Potential meeting/review with Judge Miller (implied availability 'tomorrow') | Unknown (likely USVI or Court) | View |
| 2019-08-08 | N/A | Submission of Search Warrant Application | New York / USVI context | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Status Conference in USA v. Epstein before Judge Richard M. Berman | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 2019-07-07 | N/A | Application for a search and seizure warrant submitted and signed. | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Execution of search warrant at defendant's residence where images were discovered. | Defendant's Residence | View |
| 2018-12-06 | N/A | Proffer session at SDNY. | SDNY | View |
| 2008-09-17 | N/A | Sending unredacted documents via FedEx | West Palm Beach to Katherin... | View |
| 2006-12-20 | N/A | Creation of i2 Analyst Notebook Charts documenting assistance provided to Intelligence Analyst. | Miami | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Special Agent moved from Louisville to Miami and joined the Epstein investigation shortly after. | Miami, FL | View |
This document is an application for a search and seizure warrant for Jeffrey Epstein's multi-story residence in New York, NY, dated July 7, 2019. The warrant was sought based on probable cause to believe the premises contain evidence of sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy, with Jeffrey Epstein identified as the target subject. The application details testimony from 'Victim-1' regarding sexual abuse by Epstein at the premises between 2002 and 2005, and observations by law enforcement within the residence that corroborate Victim-1's descriptions, including a 'Massage Room' and a binder labeled 'PB Girls'.
An email chain from April 2020 involving a Paralegal Specialist named Hamilton at the SDNY (Southern District of New York) requesting a consolidated hard drive of evidence 'returns' for the Epstein case. The recipient notes security restrictions preventing the attachment of external drives to the system holding 'financial productions' and plans to consult a special agent. The final email notes that Hamilton is leaving SDNY and hands off the case responsibilities to a colleague.
This document is a transcript of Grand Jury testimony from February 6, 2007, detailing the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, which began after a referral from the Palm Beach Police Department. The testimony focuses on Epstein's residences, his ownership of multiple aircraft, payments to underage females for sexual massages, and the FBI's efforts to establish an interstate nexus by examining flight manifests and the cell phone records of Epstein's assistant, who contacted underage victims.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach, before a judge. The discussion centers on the extent to which the defense can question the thoroughness of the government's investigation and comment on the absence of evidence. The judge clarifies that while direct testimony about why certain investigative steps were or were not taken is restricted, the defense is permitted to make arguments to the jury based on the absence of evidence.
This legal document is a motion from the Government arguing that the court should preclude the defense from calling case agents to testify about matters the Government deems irrelevant. These topics include the thoroughness, scope, timeline, and charging decisions of prior investigations in Florida and New York. The Government contends that this testimony is not relevant to the defendant's guilt or innocence and asks the court to require the defense to make an offer of proof before introducing such arguments or evidence.
This legal document is a portion of a motion filed by the prosecution ('Government') arguing against the defense's desire to introduce evidence related to a past charging decision from a Florida investigation. The prosecution contends this evidence is irrelevant, cumulative, and would invite the jury to speculate, creating a 'bizarre spectacle' that distracts from the actual evidence of the current trial. The document cites case law to support its position that the jury should only consider the evidence presented in this specific case, not the prosecutorial decisions made in other jurisdictions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity