Green
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
W Timothy Gallwey
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | High-level foreign policy meeting regarding the Syrian Civil War and Iran strategy. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Court ruling | Ruling in the case of United States v. Green. | 11th Cir. | View |
EFTA00033428.pdf
This document is a Daily Lieutenant's Log from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York for July 9, 2019. It details three shifts (Morning, Day, Evening) and notes that Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054) was on 'Psych Obs. w/inmate companion' during this time. The log records operational issues, specifically that the fire alarm and sprinkler system were nonoperational during the morning watch but operational by the day watch, though the PA system malfunctioned. It also tracks inmate movements to court, hospitals, transfers, and new commitments.
DOJ-OGR-00009204.jpg
This legal document is a page from a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing that she is entitled to a new trial due to false answers given by Juror No. 50 during jury selection. The central argument is that Maxwell does not need to prove the juror's falsehoods were deliberate, citing several legal precedents to support the claim that even honest mistakes can warrant a new trial to ensure the constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. The motion criticizes the government's position as a weak attempt to achieve "finality" at the expense of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00009883.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is part of a motion on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing for a new trial. The central claim is that she does not need to prove that Juror No. 50's false answers during jury selection were deliberately made. The document cites multiple legal precedents to support the argument that even an honest but mistaken answer from a juror can be grounds for a new trial, especially when it raises questions of juror bias.
DOJ-OGR-00003048.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated April 16, 2021, that discusses the application of the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule. It cites numerous federal court cases, including from the Supreme Court, to argue that suppressing evidence is a 'last resort' intended to deter deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent police misconduct. The text emphasizes the 'good-faith' exception, particularly when law enforcement acts in reasonable reliance on a search warrant, suggesting that suppression is generally not warranted in such cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015276.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or article describing the culture of 'dead pools' (betting on celebrity deaths). It contrasts commercial pools (referencing Howard Stern) with a specific group called 'The Game,' where professionals play under macabre aliases for bragging rights rather than money. The page includes quotes from players explaining their motivations and comparing the hobby to scientific data analysis. The document bears a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015276).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025805.jpg
This document contains minutes or notes from a high-level foreign policy meeting focusing on the Syrian Civil War and its implications for Iran's nuclear ambitions. Various experts and officials (including individuals likely to be Madeleine Albright, Martin Indyk, and others) discuss the pros and cons of military intervention in Syria, the role of the UN, and the strategic 'pivot to Asia'. The document is stamped with a House Oversight footer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016079.jpg
This document is page 389 of a bibliography from a book, likely related to mathematics, logic, physics, music, or consciousness studies, given the titles listed (e.g., 'Gödel’s Theorem', 'Musicophilia', 'The Emperor’s New Mind'). It lists citations for works by prominent scientists and thinkers such as Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, Oliver Sacks, and Alan Turing. The page includes a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a congressional investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
9/11 Aftermath
“Do you think this is the endgame?”
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity