| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-01 | N/A | Planned publication of a book by 'Patterson' about Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2016-08-01 | N/A | Planned publication of a book by 'Patterson', which is the catalyst for the strategic discussion ... | N/A | View |
| 2016-08-01 | N/A | Anticipated publication of the 'Patterson book'. | N/A | View |
This legal document, part of a court filing from June 15, 2022, argues against applying a sentencing enhancement for 'undue influence'. The text asserts that the evidence does not support the claim that a witness named Carolyn was unduly influenced by Epstein or Ms. Maxwell. To support this, it cites Carolyn's own testimony that she actively sought out massage appointments, recruited other minors for money, and refused offers to travel to Epstein's island, indicating her actions were voluntary.
This document is page 4 of a 29-page legal filing (Document 662) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 15, 2022. It is a table of authorities listing various court cases, statutes such as the 'Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of 1998', and other sources like the Merriam-Webster dictionary and United States Sentencing Guidelines. The page numbers where these authorities are cited within the main document are also provided.
This document is a page of handwritten legal notes filed on October 12, 2021, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text presents a legal argument focusing on 'Plain Language' statutory interpretation, specifically distinguishing between 'exploitation' and 'sexual or physical abuse.' The author cites several legal precedents (Patterson v. Schriro, US v. Pharis, US v. Dodge) and criticizes the Fifth Circuit for ignoring guidance regarding statutory construction and the misfiling of statute of limitation language in 1990.
This document appears to be an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' included in a House Oversight Committee report (stamped 019181). It contains a transcript of a law enforcement interview involving officers Frick, Recarey, and Dobbs interrogating an unnamed witness/suspect. The officers are leveraging the threat of a 'second-degree felony' versus a misdemeanor 'delinquency of a minor' charge to coerce the witness into cooperating to build a case against 'Jeff' (Epstein).
This document contains pages 50 and 51 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (James Patterson), stamped as a House Oversight Committee exhibit. It features a first-person account by a victim describing gifts received from Jeffrey Epstein (underwear, tickets) and a specific incident of sexual abuse on a massage table. A third individual, whose name is redacted, was present and naked during the assault, with Epstein stating he performed the act specifically for the redacted person to watch.
This document is a scan of pages 236 and 237 from a book (likely by Patterson) included in House Oversight Committee discovery materials. Chapter 62 describes a 'Law & Order: SVU' episode aired on February 2, 2011, which closely paralleled Jeffrey Epstein's legal troubles, featuring a plot about a billionaire flying a young French girl on a private jet for a 'birthday party' where she was treated as a 'present'.
This document contains pages 228 and 229 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (by James Patterson), stamped as a House Oversight exhibit. The text features an analysis by an expert named Salter regarding the psychology of sexual predators, specifically discussing narcissism, psychopathy, and the 'thinking errors' used by those who prey on young girls, while applying these concepts hypothetically to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a scan of pages 226-227 from a book (likely by James Patterson), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. Chapter 59 features Dr. Anna Salter, a psychologist based in Madison, Wisconsin, discussing the psychology of sex offenders like Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew in November 2015. She uses a metaphor of a car's motor (impulses) and brakes (control) to explain that sexual offenses against children are always a result of 'bad brakes' (lack of control), regardless of the 'motor' (attraction).
This document is a scanned excerpt from a book (Chapter 62, likely by James Patterson) included in House Oversight evidence. It describes events on February 2, 2011, focusing on a *Law & Order: SVU* episode that aired on that date which closely paralleled Jeffrey Epstein's legal history. The text details the plot of the episode, which involved a billionaire flying a young French girl to New York on a private jet for a 'birthday party' where the girls were the 'present'.
This document contains pages 226 and 227 from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich'), marked as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. Chapter 59 details an analysis by Dr. Anna Salter from November 2015, where she explains the psychology of child sex offenders like Jeffrey Epstein using an analogy of a car's motor (impulses) versus its brakes (control). The text also explicitly links Prince Andrew to Epstein, questioning their public association and shared accusations.
This document is a scanned excerpt from a book (likely by James Patterson) contained within a House Oversight file. It details the experiences of Epstein's houseman, Alfredo Rodriguez, who was fired for calling 911 on a masseuse's car and later imprisoned. The text describes the distress of Epstein's maid, Lupita, regarding cleaning up after sexual encounters, and lists various vehicles owned by Epstein.
This document contains a scan of page 212 and a facing page from a book (likely James Patterson's work on Epstein) labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022021'. It features the signature block of R. Alexander Acosta, Former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, concluding a statement about case assessments, followed by a section divider titled 'PART VI Aftermath'.
This document is an email from journalist Tim Malloy to an unnamed individual with a background in PR and show business who was an acquaintance of Jeffrey Epstein. Malloy is soliciting the recipient's participation or insight for an upcoming Netflix documentary series (produced by Lisa Bryant and Joe Berlinger, with James Patterson consulting). The email includes a legal disclaimer referencing 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and a specific contact email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
These pages, likely from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' and included in House Oversight files, detail the experiences of Epstein's staff. Page 216 lists Epstein's assets (vehicles, boats) and legal restrictions regarding pornography, while Page 217 focuses on houseman Alfredo Rodriguez, who was fired for calling 911 on a masseuse's car and who witnessed the distress of a maid named Lupita regarding cleaning up after Epstein's sexual encounters.
This document appears to be a page (212) from a book or report, specifically the start of 'Part VI: Aftermath'. It contains the end of a letter or statement signed by R. Alexander Acosta, Former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document consists of pages 202-203 from the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. The text details the lenient work release conditions of Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration at the 'Stockade,' noting he was allowed to leave six days a week to visit his lawyer, foundation, or home in West Palm Beach. Crucially, it identifies Jean-Luc Brunel as residing at Epstein's El Brillo Way home for the duration of Epstein's jail sentence, describing Brunel as a 'suave' man with a French accent.
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 178-179) from a book, likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich', included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. It details events in July 2006 involving 'Mary' (a victim), Detective Recarey, and Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek regarding the decision to take the case to a Grand Jury. The text highlights Recarey's frustration with the legal strategy and the lack of communication from the State Attorney's office to the victim's family.
In this March 2016 email chain, journalist Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on a PR strategy to counter an upcoming book by James Patterson. Wolff suggests Epstein publicly reinvent himself as an 'anti-Trump voice' to gain political cover during the 2016 election cycle and recommends high-profile interviews (specifically Charlie Rose). Epstein forwards this advice to Kathy Ruemmler, who is traveling to NYC, and comments 'Nuts'.
This document is an email chain from March 18, 2016, where journalist Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on a public relations strategy to counter an upcoming book by an author named Patterson. Wolff suggests Epstein should publicly become an 'anti-Trump voice' to gain 'political cover' and deflect attention, proposing an op-ed and a TV interview with Charlie Rose. Epstein forwarded this advice to his legal team, including Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Darren Indyke, prompting a reply from Weinberg marking the communication as 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity