| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Creation of 3,500 additional children's centers | United Kingdom (un-serviced... | View |
This document is page 34 of a legal filing from December 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details expert opinions from Mr. Perry (UK law) and William JuliƩ (French law), both arguing that Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition to the US from either the UK or France, and would be unlikely to receive bail in the UK if she absconded there. These arguments appear designed to support a request for bail in the US by minimizing her flight risk.
This legal document summarizes expert opinions regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's potential extradition. Mr. Perry, an expert on UK law, concludes that Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the United States or be granted bail. William JuliƩ, an expert on French law, clarifies that, contrary to government representations, the extradition of a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
This document page, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp, appears to be part of a larger report analyzing the Early Childhood Education (ECE) industry. It focuses on the United Kingdom's 'Sure Start' initiative, noting a planned $18 billion investment and the creation of 3,500 children's centers. It includes a bar chart comparing per-child expenditure across several nations in 2001, showing the UK with the highest expenditure at $172 per child relative to the other countries listed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity