District Executive's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Joseph Pecorino
|
Official |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00020393.pdf
This document is a court order filed on July 9, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It schedules an arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, to be held remotely due to COVID-19, and provides dial-in information for the public and press. It also outlines procedures for alleged victims to be heard and sets restrictions on recording the proceedings.
EFTA00016726.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (20cr330). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim provides a list of attendees, including legal counsel and Maxwell's family members (Ian, Kevin, Pandora, Philip, Isabel, Christine), for an October 21 teleconference and a November 1 in-person pretrial conference. The email responds to a request from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers regarding logistics, COVID-19 protocols, and speaking rules for the upcoming hearings.
EFTA00016513.pdf
Court Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a sealed letter regarding victim attendance at the trial and outlines COVID-19 protocols for public access, including overflow rooms. It designates Wendy Olson (Victim Witness Unit) to coordinate access for alleged victims and Joseph Pecorino (District Executive's Office) to coordinate access for the defendant's family.
EFTA00011137.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter received from a lawyer for an alleged victim regarding trial attendance and establishes protocols for public and victim access during the trial, including COVID-19 measures and overflow rooms. Contact information is provided for Wendy Olson (Victim Witness Unit) and Joseph Pecorino (District Executive's Office) to coordinate access for victims and the defendant's family.
DOJ-OGR-00008260.jpg
This is page 16 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 8, 2021. Ms. Comey clarifies procedural questions with the Court regarding the presence of supervisors in the witness room. Mr. Everdell (Defense) raises an issue regarding a 'Touhy request' submitted several weeks prior, seeking a witness from Customs and Border Protection to authenticate border crossing records, noting there are complications but hoping for a resolution or stipulation.
DOJ-OGR-00000846.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing filings and orders related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment against Maxwell, motions for attorneys to appear on her behalf, and a detailed court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the procedures for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order also outlines public and media access to the proceedings via telephone and a limited-capacity video feed at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00020721.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report (Case 22-1426) dated June 2022, detailing procedural orders leading up to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders establishing strict protocols for victim impact statements, including deadlines for submission and objections, and prohibits electronic devices in the courtroom. It also notes letters from defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim and attorney Robert Lewis, and issues a correction regarding the contact information for Victim Witness Unit Coordinator Wendy Olsen.
DOJ-OGR-00020631.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 22, 2023, but detailing events from July 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding public and press access to hearings, followed by a list of filings such as attorney appearances and motions. The key event is a minute entry for Maxwell's arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty via video conference, was denied bail, and had a trial date set for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020473.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings and orders between May 10, 2022, and June 21, 2022. It details pre-sentencing motions, including a denied request for an extension by the defense and granted motions regarding Speedy Trial Exclusion. Significant entries include logistical orders for the June 28, 2022 sentencing hearing and strict protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00020395.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from July 9 to July 15, 2020. It details the arraignment held on July 14, 2020, where Maxwell pleaded Not Guilty via video conference due to COVID-19 protocols, and Judge Alison J. Nathan denied bail, remanding Maxwell to custody. The docket also records attorney appearances for the defense (Cohen, Everdell, Pagliuca) and sets the trial date for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00016136.jpg
This document is a court transcript from an afternoon session on August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Before the jury is brought in, the judge confirms with attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim that there are no preliminary matters. The judge then announces that overflow courtrooms have been successfully set up to ensure public access, thanking the district executive's and clerk's offices for their assistance.
DOJ-OGR-00019465.jpg
This document is a court docket report from July 2020 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). It details the filing of a superseding indictment, notices of appearance by Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), and a Pro Hac Vice motion for attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca. It also includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting a briefing schedule and establishing protocols for a remote arraignment and bail hearing on July 14, 2020, including teleconference access numbers and COVID-19 safety measures for physical attendance.
DOJ-OGR-00019253.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated September 9, 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan detailing procedures for public and media access to hearings via phone and video feed, given COVID-19 restrictions. The docket entries list filings from mid-July 2020, including attorney appearances for Maxwell, motions regarding her detention, and a minute entry for her arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty, was denied bail, and remanded into custody.
DOJ-OGR-00019802.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering dates from July 8 to July 13, 2020, regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details administrative motions for attorney appearances (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the filing of a superseding indictment, and specific logistical orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, including COVID-19 protocols and public access via telephone.
DOJ-OGR-00019778.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8-13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment, notices of appearance for Maxwell's attorneys, and memoranda regarding her detention. A significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules Maxwell's remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, and outlines procedures for public and media access during the COVID-19 pandemic.
DOJ-OGR-00019752.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 7 of 24) from July 2020 regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details procedural events including the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear (Pro Hac Vice), and a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the logistics for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The document also lists the appearances of attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00019723.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8 to July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear on Maxwell's behalf, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The order specifies how the public, press, victims, and legal counsel can access the proceedings via teleconference and limited in-person viewing.
DOJ-OGR-00019700.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 21-58, detailing legal proceedings related to Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions and notices for attorney appearances on behalf of Maxwell, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, specifies how the public, press, and involved parties can access the hearing via teleconference and limited in-person viewing due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00010524.jpg
A court order filed on June 17, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules the sentencing for June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York and outlines logistics for press, public, and victim access, while prohibiting electronic devices and telephone dial-in access.
DOJ-OGR-00014693.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, likely relating to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details a discussion regarding courthouse COVID-19 mask mandates (N95/KN95) and the handling of jury notes during deliberations. Specifically, the jury requested a transcript for 'Parkinson' (Court Exhibit 13) and had previously received supplies and a transcript for 'Matt'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity