sweet Latin American man
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CIA / Swedish secret services / Political group
|
Adversarial investigator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Case assignment |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trip | A 'sweet Latin American man' picked up the witness every week or two for three years when she was... | N/A | View |
EFTA00014506.pdf
A formal notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated July 18, 2017, announcing a change in the assigned case manager for docket 16-3945cv ([Redacted] v. Maxwell). The document lists Robert A. Katzmann as Chief Judge and references the underlying District Court case (15-cv-7433) presided over by Judge Sweet.
DOJ-OGR-00017656.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner challenges Jane's testimony regarding the frequency with which she was picked up by an unnamed man and the method by which meetings at Epstein's house were arranged. The questioner points out a discrepancy between her current testimony about Ghislaine arranging meetings and a statement she gave to the government in November 2019.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031755.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031755) detailing extreme torture methods used for 'programming' individuals, including sexual humiliation and electrocution. It references an investigator named 'Sweet' who expresses concern about potential conspiracy theories regarding his death involving the CIA, Swedish secret services, or a 'bizarre political group' he was investigating.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017847.jpg
This document is page 782 from a court opinion discussing subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It outlines the legal standards for immunity of foreign states, citing precedents like *Saudi Arabia v. Nelson* and *Virtual Countries v. Republic of South Africa*, and details the burden of proof required for plaintiffs to challenge a foreign state's immunity.
Fear of assassination/conspiracy theories
Sweet discusses the potential theories that would arise if he died before finishing his book.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity