Slate
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00037123.pdf
This document is a screenshot of the CHILD USA website (childusa.org), specifically a page listing various law firms and individuals (Matthew and Alaina Tonelli). The list appears to represent donors, sponsors, or partners of the organization. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00037123, indicating it is part of a larger discovery production likely related to Epstein-associated litigation.
EFTA00037121.pdf
This document is a screenshot of the Child USA website (childusa.org), specifically a donor page listing 'Bronze' level contributors who donated $10,000. It lists 14 law firms as donors. The document bears a Bates stamp 'EFTA00037121', suggesting it is part of a production of documents related to Epstein or related litigation, likely highlighting legal firms involved in child rights or sexual abuse cases.
EFTA00030281.pdf
This document is a Law360 New York email newsletter dated July 15, 2019. The top stories focus on Jeffrey Epstein's legal battles, specifically highlighting that potential child pornography found in his home could derail his bail bid, and federal allegations that he paid $350,000 to influence witnesses. The newsletter also covers various other legal developments involving SunEdison, L'Oreal, Donald Trump's financial subpoenas, and various corporate lawsuits.
DOJ-OGR-00010153.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, which lists publications by Stephen Gillers from 2003 to 2006. The articles, published in various newspapers and legal journals, cover topics such as judicial ethics, the Martha Stewart trial, and judicial nominations including those of Miers and Alito. Several publications were co-authored with D. Luban, S. Lubet, and Deborah Rhode.
DOJ-OGR-00009474.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or expert report bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers. It lists his publications (items 122-139) between 2003 and 2006, covering topics such as legal ethics, judicial selection, and high-profile cases like Martha Stewart's trial and Supreme Court nominations. The document bears a header indicating it was filed in 2022 as part of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330), likely as an exhibit related to expert testimony or legal arguments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018695.jpg
This document appears to be a page of endnotes or references, likely from a larger report, article, or book draft. It contains hyperlinks to external articles and blog posts organized under headers regarding 'Polyamory' and 'Sex Work' (specifically focusing on 'Sugar Baby' relationships and the website SeekingArrangement). The latest dates in the URLs are from 2011. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018695.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016517.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes legal underenforcement and systemic bias, specifically regarding police misconduct, sexual assault, and crimes against marginalized groups (sex workers, undocumented immigrants, LGBT individuals). It argues that professional relationships between prosecutors and police create conflicts of interest that prevent fair adjudication, citing various legal standards and academic works.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016514.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of criminal prosecution jurisdiction between state and federal levels, particularly regarding police misconduct and sexual assault. It argues that federal oversight is an imperfect backstop due to higher legal standards and political shifts, and highlights the lack of safeguards against unjustified decisions not to prosecute compared to the robust protections against improper charging. The text includes extensive footnotes citing legal cases, statutes, and articles related to police violence and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027165.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage log from February 2017 between 'jee' (associated with the email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted sender who identifies herself as 'Melanie'. The exchange includes links to articles about economic 'cost disease' and AI in medicine (IBM Watson), followed by Melanie providing a new mobile phone number (206-382-7848). The document originates from the House Oversight Committee records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025160.jpg
This document is page 14 of a 'Frankfurt 2016 Hotlist' produced by Brockman, Inc., a literary agency. It provides summaries and rights information for two books: 'The Power of Human' by Adam Waytz and 'SCALE' by Geoffrey West. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, linking it to a congressional investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to John Brockman and the scientific community (specifically the Santa Fe Institute), though Epstein is not explicitly named on this page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030430.jpg
This is an email from John Brockman to Jeffrey Epstein dated February 6, 2017. Brockman recounts the recent, sudden death of his acquaintance Katinka's brother, provides an update on his own brother Philip's prostate cancer and new treatment, and shares an anecdote about representing the Biosphere 'cult' in the 90s, noting Steve Bannon's role as its former CEO. Brockman concludes by suggesting he is available to meet that afternoon or the next morning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028332.jpg
This document is a news article, marked as a House Oversight committee exhibit, concerning a New York Times report on Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The report alleged that in May 2017, Rosenstein suggested secretly recording President Trump and invoking the 25th Amendment, claims which reporter Michael Schmidt later defended as serious and documented in memos by then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe. The article places these allegations in the context of the Mueller investigation and recent developments involving Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity