| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Cellmates |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Cellmates implied |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Cellmates |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co located inmates |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Cellmate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | N/A | Departure of inmate Reyes from Epstein's cell. | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-08-09 | N/A | Cellmate Reyes released; Epstein returned to cell with no cellmate despite alert status. | Cell | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Various inmates placed in Special Housing Unit (SHU) for disciplinary codes or pending SIS. | SHU | View |
| 2019-07-31 | Inmate housing assignment | Inmate Epstein was placed with inmate Reyes as a cellmate. | Metropolitan Correctional C... | View |
| 2019-07-29 | N/A | Removed from suicide watch and returned to SHU with cellmate Reyes. | Special Housing Unit | View |
A US Government memorandum dated August 12, 2019, documenting that on August 9, 2019 (the day before Epstein's death), staff were informed that Inmate Reyes was leaving the Special Housing Unit (SHU) and might not return, and that Jeffrey Epstein would require a cellmate upon returning from an attorney visit. The document includes a daily assignment roster for August 9, 2019, identifying specific staff members assigned to the SHU, with officers Shakir, Joyner, Grijalva, and Davis specifically highlighted.
This document is a timeline of events regarding Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration from July 23, 2019, to his death on August 10, 2019. It details a prior incident on July 23 involving cellmate Tartaglione, his subsequent housing with cellmate Reyes, and the events of August 9-10 where he was left without a cellmate despite requirements. The log notes that officers failed to conduct required counts and checks on the morning of his death.
A Federal Bureau of Prisons memorandum from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, dated August 12, 2019. It reports on a staff briefing from August 9, 2019, where officers were informed that Inmate Reyes was being moved (WAB) and might not return, and specifically that Jeffrey Epstein would need a cellmate upon returning from an attorney visit.
This document is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York dated August 2, 2019, covering activities from August 1, 2019. It highlights significant security concerns, specifically unsecured food slots in Unit 5-South due to tampering or malfunction, which posed a 'grave safety and security risk' aggravated by severe staff shortages. The report also details inmate movements, including admissions, releases, and placements into the Special Housing Unit (SHU), and notes one redacted inmate (likely Jeffrey Epstein based on context/timeline) on psychological observation with an inmate companion.
A Bureau of Prisons memorandum from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York dated August 12, 2019. It documents a shift briefing on August 9, 2019 (the day before Epstein's death), where staff were informed that Inmate Reyes was being moved ('going WAB') and might not return, and that Inmate Epstein would require a cellmate after returning from an attorney visit.
This document is a chain of emails between the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and implied recipients at the FBI and SDNY, dated January 8-14, 2020. The correspondence concerns the initiation of a 'Board of Inquiry' to review operations at MCC New York following Jeffrey Epstein's death, specifically examining camera operations, staffing, and special housing policies. A key focus of the OIG report mentioned is the investigation into why Epstein was not assigned a new cellmate after the departure of inmate Reyes.
This legal document is an argument on behalf of defendant Ms. Maxwell, challenging the composition of the grand jury that indicted her. It cites an analysis by jury expert Jeffrey Martin from a similar case, United States v. Balde, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons in the White Plains jury wheel. The argument posits that since Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same system, her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community was violated.
This legal document argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was denied her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community. It cites a parallel case, U.S. v. Balde, and an expert analysis by Jeffrey Martin, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic individuals in the White Plains jury wheel. Because Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same pool, the document contends this analysis applies to her case as well.
This document is page 3 (Table of Authorities) of a legal filing (Document 126) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists legal precedents (cases) and statutes cited in the brief, including Supreme Court cases like Duren v. Missouri and Second Circuit cases like United States v. Jackman. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002323.
This document is page 'ii' (labeled Page 3 of 13 in the PDF) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (Cases) and Statutes cited elsewhere in the filing. The citations heavily reference cases involving jury selection and fair representation (e.g., Duren v. Missouri, Taylor v. Louisiana), suggesting the main document likely involves a motion regarding jury composition or selection.
This is an email chain from July 31, 2019, concerning inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054). The initial message from a Bureau of Prisons employee clarifies that Epstein does have a cellmate, Reyes (#85993-054). A subsequent follow-up email from a Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center adds a correction that psychology staff, along with medical staff, are responsible for determining if an inmate's suicidal gesture is sincere or for manipulation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity