Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Dist. Ct.

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
2
Documents
3
Also known as:
U.S. Dist. Ct. for Cent. Dist. of Cal. Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App.
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2019-09-16 Court ruling Dist. Ct. closes CVRA case and denies petitioners' request for remedies. N/A View
2019-02-21 Court ruling Dist. Ct. issues opinion finding U.S. violated the CVRA. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00021390.jpg

This document is a timeline detailing key events from 2006 to 2020 related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It outlines actions taken by the FBI, USAO, and DOJ officials, including Villafaña, Sloman, and Acosta, regarding victim interviews and notifications surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and state court plea. The timeline also tracks subsequent legal challenges by victims, court rulings on CVRA violations, and major developments in the case, such as Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.

Legal document (timeline)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg

This legal document, filed on June 29, 2022, argues for the immediate unsealing of a defendant's motion for a new trial and related documents, such as juror questionnaires. The argument is based on the First Amendment right of public access to court proceedings, which is asserted to be particularly strong when allegations of juror misconduct are involved. The document contends that the public interest in transparency is significant, especially in a high-profile case, and that no sufficient justification for sealing the documents has been provided.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013388.jpg

This page from a legal filing (page 19) argues that 'Edwards' is entitled to summary judgment because Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment. The document asserts that adverse inferences must be drawn from Epstein's silence, leading to the conclusion that he was a 'serial molester of children' rather than a victim of improper lawsuits. It cites Florida case law to support the argument that silence in civil cases can be used as evidence against a party.

Legal filing (motion for summary judgment / memorandum of law)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search