Louella Rabuyo
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-20 | N/A | Deposition of Louella Rabuyo | Unknown | View |
017-20.pdf
This affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards details difficulties in discovery for a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 10-81111). It alleges that key witnesses Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. Crucially, it lists specific individuals for whom Epstein paid legal fees to prevent them from testifying against him, explicitly labeling Sarah Kellen as a 'procurer of girls' and Nadia Marcinkova as a 'live-in sex slave', while also identifying his personal pilots and household staff.
015.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
015-01.pdf
Affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards in Case 10-81111 detailing obstruction tactics by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. The document asserts that Jean Luc Brunel visited Epstein 67 times in jail and that both Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. It explicitly lists Epstein's inner circle (including pilots and household staff like Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova) and notes that Epstein paid for their legal counsel to control their testimony.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013469.jpg
This document is an affidavit from an attorney who joined Scott Rothstein's law firm (RRA) in 2009 while representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The author denies involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and refutes Epstein's allegations that the lawsuits were used for fraud or that depositions of 'high profile friends' were improper. The text asserts that Epstein paid for the legal representation of his employees and associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and pilots) to ensure they refused to testify.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013364.jpg
This page of a legal affidavit, likely by attorney Brad Edwards, addresses allegations that his lawsuits against Epstein were used to fuel Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The author denies knowledge of the scheme and defends the strategy of deposing Epstein's high-profile friends. The document asserts that Epstein paid the legal fees for key associates including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski to ensure they refused to testify (pleading the Fifth) regarding daily sexual abuse of minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013344.jpg
This document details legal obstruction in the Epstein case, specifically concerning Jean Luc Brunel, who evaded a deposition by falsely claiming to be in France while actually staying at Epstein's West Palm Beach home. It further alleges that Epstein paid for the legal representation of a vast network of associates—including pilots, house staff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and his brother—making it nearly impossible for plaintiffs to secure independent testimony.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013341.jpg
This legal filing (page 23) details allegations regarding conflict of interest involving former AUSA Reinhart, who switched from prosecuting to defending Epstein's associates. It cites various depositions (house manager, housekeeper, pilot, and Alfredo Rodriguez) to establish Ghislaine Maxwell's deep involvement in managing Epstein's affairs and her active participation in the sexual abuse and documentation of underage girls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013495.tif
This document is a statement or response addressing allegations related to a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein and lawsuits against Epstein. The speaker denies knowledge of Rothstein's fraudulent activities and asserts their actions in representing clients against Epstein were legitimate, uncovering evidence of Epstein's sexual molestation and the obstruction of justice by Epstein and his associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity