Trove
Sign In Sign Up

D. Minn.

Location
Mentions
8
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

025.pdf

This document is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the derivative litigation against JP Morgan Chase & Co. It outlines arguments regarding pleading standards, demand futility, and failure to state claims against the defendants, including specific points related to JPMorgan's termination of Epstein as a client and the oversight of internal controls by the board of directors. The document includes a table of authorities citing numerous legal cases.

Legal document / memorandum of law
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000635.jpg

This document is a legal filing, specifically page 3 of a 'Motion to Intervene' in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on August 27, 2019. The filer, identified as the Intervenor/Relator, outlines a timeline of legal actions against the USDOJ and Bill Barr, alleging a conspiracy, fraud, and the monopolization of the judiciary. The filer connects their case to the Jeffrey Epstein case, citing the concept of "prosecutorial discretion" and argues for their right to intervene based on legal precedent where a third party's constitutional rights are implicated.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008987.jpg

This document is page 8 of a court filing (Document 609) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 24, 2022. It presents legal arguments citing various precedents to establish that jurors retain privacy interests after a trial concludes and that jurors face criminal exposure for perjury on questionnaires. It also argues that third parties may intervene in criminal trials to protect their constitutional rights.

Court filing / legal brief (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005862.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The text presents the prosecution's (Government's) argument that using the term "victim" to refer to witnesses is not prejudicial to the defendant's rights. The argument is supported by citing numerous legal precedents from various U.S. courts which have previously ruled on the matter.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search