| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Expert witness for defense |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-01 | Review | A select team conducted a review of the United Kingdom’s extradition arrangements, which formed t... | United Kingdom | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Review of the United Kingdom’s extradition arrangements conducted by a team including Mr. Perry. | United Kingdom | View |
This document is page 34 of a legal filing from December 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details expert opinions from Mr. Perry (UK law) and William Julié (French law), both arguing that Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition to the US from either the UK or France, and would be unlikely to receive bail in the UK if she absconded there. These arguments appear designed to support a request for bail in the US by minimizing her flight risk.
This legal document summarizes expert opinions regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's potential extradition. Mr. Perry, an expert on UK law, concludes that Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the United States or be granted bail. William Julié, an expert on French law, clarifies that, contrary to government representations, the extradition of a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
The report (Perry Rep.) opines that Ghislaine Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the US, her waiver of rights would be admissible, and she is unlikely to be granted bail.
The report (Perry Rep.) opines that Ghislaine Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the US, her waiver of rights would be admissible, and she is unlikely to be granted bail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity