Richard Barnett
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
Customs and Border Protection
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-27 | N/A | Execution of Last Will and Testament by Jeffrey E. Epstein | New York, USA | View |
| 2010-11-22 | N/A | Richard Barnett signed and swore to the affidavit before a notary. | New York | View |
| 2010-11-02 | N/A | Affidavit sworn and subscribed before Notary Harry I. Beller. | New York | View |
| 2010-10-29 | N/A | Signing and notarization of Richard Barnett's affidavit. | New York | View |
| 2010-10-13 | N/A | Discovery of unmarked envelope in the mailbox containing legal documents. | 9 East 71st Street, New Yor... | View |
| 2010-10-13 | N/A | Discovery of legal documents in an unmarked envelope in the mailbox at Epstein's NY home. | 9 East 71st Street, New Yor... | View |
| 2010-10-08 | N/A | Richard Barnett was present at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY for the entire day. | 9 East 71st Street, New Yor... | View |
020.pdf
This document is a Reply in Support of a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2010. The defense argues that the plaintiff failed to properly serve Epstein because the papers were left with an individual named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York home (9 East 71st St), but the plaintiff failed to prove 'Mark' resided there or was of suitable discretion. The filing also seeks to strike allegations regarding obstruction of justice in prior litigation and opposes sanctions against Epstein.
020-01.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Affidavit filed on November 22, 2010, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD). Richard Barnett, the property manager of 9 East 71st Street in New York, testifies that he does not reside at the property, that no one resided there on October 8, 2010, and specifically that Jeffrey Epstein was not present at that location on that date.
015.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
014.pdf
A legal motion filed on November 10, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting the court to quash service of process in the case of M.J. v. Epstein. The defense argues that leaving an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of Epstein's New York vacation home and claiming to leave papers with a non-existent person named 'Mark' violates Federal, New York, and Florida service laws. The document includes arguments citing specific statutes and an affidavit from Richard Barnett denying the presence of anyone named 'Mark' at the residence.
012-01.pdf
This document is a legal affidavit filed on November 3, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The affiant, Richard Barnett, states that he was present at Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street, NYC, for the entire day of October 8, 2010. He testifies that no individual named 'Mark' worked, resided, was present, or received a subpoena at that location on that date.
007.pdf
This document is a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on October 29, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers argue that the plaintiff, 'M.J.', failed to properly serve Epstein with the lawsuit because the documents were merely left in an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of his New York residence (9 East 71st Street) rather than being delivered personally as required by law. The document details the specific dates of the attempted service and cites Florida, New York, and Federal laws to support the argument that the service was legally ineffective.
007-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit by Richard Barnett filed on October 29, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in the Southern District of Florida. Barnett testifies that on October 13, 2010, he discovered an unmarked envelope containing legal documents (Summons, Complaint, Civil Rico Statement) in the mailbox of Epstein's home at 9 East 71st Street, NYC. He asserts that service was never personally delivered to anyone at the residence.
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
053.pdf
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
EFTA00016865.pdf
This document is the Last Will and Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein, executed on January 27, 2012. It directs the transfer of all his property to 'The Jeffrey E. Epstein Trust One' (a pour-over will) and appoints Darren K. Indyke, Joseph Pagano, and Lawrence Newman as Executors, with Jes Staley and Andrew Farkas named as successors. The will includes broad powers for the Executors and a strict 'in terrorem' clause to disinherit any beneficiary who contests the validity of the will or the trust.
DOJ-OGR-00015379.jpg
This document is page 7 of a FedEx invoice dated November 25, 2002, detailing three overnight shipments sent from Jeffrey Epstein's account at 457 Madison Ave. The shipments were sent by Doug Schuettle and Richard Barnett to ATH Architects (referencing property 116 E 65th), Miller & Ravid, and Jusler Electrical Corp. The document lists tracking numbers, costs, and delivery signatures, with recipient addresses redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00015308.jpg
This document is a transaction report from Shoppers Travel, Inc., generated on April 27, 2016, detailing invoices on an accrual basis from March 10, 1999, to May 17, 1999. The report lists numerous clients and their corresponding invoice amounts, including multiple significant transactions for Ghislaine Maxwell and two transactions for 'J Epstein'. The document provides a clear record of travel-related expenses incurred by a large group of individuals through a single agency during the spring of 1999.
DOJ-OGR-00015297.jpg
This document is a 'Find Report' of all transactions from Shoppers Travel, Inc. generated on April 27, 2016. It lists invoice payments made between December 2001 and May 2002. The list includes payments for travel expenses to numerous individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein, including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Darren Indyke, and Lawrence Visoski.
DOJ-OGR-00015295.jpg
This document is a financial transaction report from Shoppers Travel, Inc., dated April 27, 2016, detailing invoices issued between September 2002 and February 2003. The report lists numerous individuals, including Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen, as recipients of invoices for travel services. Several entries have been redacted by the Department of Justice (DOJ), indicating the document is part of a legal or investigative file.
DOJ-OGR-00016623.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and defense attorneys Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Everdell regarding the scheduling of the next witness. Mr. Everdell indicates the next witness will be either Richard Barnett or Michael Aznaran from Customs and Border Protection, after which the court takes a 45-minute recess.
DOJ-OGR-00022372.jpg
This document is page 87 of a contact book or rolodex file (Bates number DOJ-OGR-00022372). It lists various individuals and vendors, including Mort Zuckerman, Graces Marketplace, and staff likely associated with Epstein's 71st Street property (Richard Barnett). Personal contact details are redacted, though one emergency number (212 965 1009) remains partially visible near Charles Miller's entry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014213.jpg
This document is a page from a contact book (likely Jeffrey Epstein's 'Little Black Book') containing detailed contact information for Jeffrey Epstein himself, real estate mogul Mort Zuckerman, and several other individuals including Richard Barnett, Charles Miller, and staff members. The Epstein entry is particularly detailed, listing multiple phone lines, staff numbers, vehicles (Mercedes and Tahoes assigned to 'JE' and 'GM'), and the email 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'. The document also links Richard Barnett and Lynn/Jojo Fontanilla directly to Epstein's operations via email addresses and work phone numbers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity