| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Stephen Reed
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
aircraft
N/A
|
Creator |
5
|
1 |
This document is page 103 from a scientific text or academic paper regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and cognitive psychology. It discusses 'Architecture for Language Processing' (Figure 5.7) and motor hierarchies, citing a theorist named Albus. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013019', indicating it was part of a document production for the US House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's connections with scientists and funding of AI research.
This document presents a high-level architecture of a human-like mind (Figure 5.1), detailing subsystems for perception, action, memory, and processing. The text discusses the rationale behind the architectural choices, comparing them to Sloman's diagram and the LIDA architecture, while explaining modifications such as the explicit inclusion of language and reinforcement components.
This document is a page (p. 96) from an academic text regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and cognitive architecture, specifically Chapter 5. It discusses technical models such as CogPrime, LIDA, and CogAff, referencing prominent AI scientists like Aaron Sloman and Jeff Hawkins. While the text itself is purely scientific, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013012' indicates this document was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's extensive funding of and connections to the scientific community.
This document is page 93 of a technical academic paper or book discussing Artificial Intelligence cognitive architectures. It specifically details 'Knowledge Representation, Action Selection and Planning' in the 'Psi' architecture, comparing it to 'CogPrime,' 'DeSTIN,' 'Soar,' and 'ACT-R.' The text is highly technical, focusing on neural clusters called 'quads,' sensory networks, and perception mechanisms. While the content is purely scientific, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013009' indicates this document was included in a House Oversight Committee production of records, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of or connections to the scientific community (specifically AI research).
This document appears to be a page from a scientific paper or textbook regarding Artificial Intelligence and cognitive architectures, specifically discussing 'Globalist versus Localist Representations'. It features a complex diagram of 'Albus's perceptual, motor and modeling hierarchies' and a text section describing 'Joshua Blue', a cognitive architecture developed by Sam Adams at IBM around 2012. The document contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012999', indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Epstein's funding or interest in scientific research.
This document appears to be page 75 of a technical academic paper or book titled 'Hybrid Cognitive Architectures.' It discusses and compares various Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models, including Shruti, James Albus's 4D/RCS, and the authors' own 'CogPrime' approach. The document bears the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012991', indicating it was included in evidence collected during the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's funding of or interest in scientific research and AI, though Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page.
This page (numbered 62) appears to be from a scientific paper or book regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and cognitive architectures. It discusses systems such as ACT-R, EPIC, Cyc, and Texai, specifically mentioning Stephen Reed's work at Cycorp and his subsequent project, Texai. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012978' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, commonly associated with the Epstein files regarding scientific funding/connections.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity