Joel Podgor
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Financial investigation | A proposed comprehensive forensic accounting of Mr. Epstein's finances to be conducted by Joel Po... | N/A | View |
024.pdf
Defense counsel Marc Fernich writes to Judge Berman to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's bail request, arguing against the government's stance that Epstein's wealth creates an irrebuttable presumption for detention. The letter proposes a forensic accounting by Joel Podgor, notes that Epstein's brother Mark is willing to secure a bond with his >$100 million net worth, clarifies Epstein's sex offender registration status in New Mexico, defends against claims regarding an expired Austrian passport, and argues that Epstein's return to the US despite media pressure proves he is not a flight risk.
022.pdf
Defense counsel Marc Fernich writes to Judge Berman to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's bail request, arguing that the government is incorrectly using Epstein's wealth to create an irrebuttable presumption of detention. The letter highlights that Epstein's brother, Mark, is willing to pledge his >$100 million net worth to secure bond, disputes the government's characterization of an expired Austrian passport, and clarifies Epstein's sex offender registration status in New Mexico. The defense also argues that Epstein did not flee despite intense media pressure in late 2018 and offers a forensic accounting of his finances.
EFTA00014482.pdf
This document is a supplemental letter from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel to Judge Richard Berman arguing for bail. The letter attempts to rebut government claims regarding flight risk, offering Epstein's brother Mark (net worth >$100M) as a bond co-signer and proposing a forensic accounting of Epstein's finances by Joel Podgor. It also addresses the expired Austrian passport (claiming it was for protection against hijacking), New Mexico sex offender registration (claiming it wasn't required), and payments to associates (claiming they were employees, not paid-off witnesses).
DOJ-OGR-00000434.jpg
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing on behalf of Mr. Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The filing argues that Epstein's finances are too complex to meet the court's 5pm deadline for a financial statement, citing his detention as an impediment. It proposes that the court accept the initial disclosure and, as a condition for granting bail, order a comprehensive forensic accounting of his finances to be conducted by Joel Podgor of the firm Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity