| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ASU
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ANU
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Investigation by ASU. | ASU | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Investigation by ANU resulting in temporary suspension and subsequent reinstatement. | ANU | View |
| 2016-11-01 | N/A | Alleged sexual misconduct incident involving a selfie at a formal banquet. | Conference (Unspecified) | View |
This document contains psychological observation notes from July 27-28, 2019, regarding Jeffrey Epstein while in custody. The notes detail his anxiety about returning to the SHU where he sustained neck injuries he claims not to remember, complaints of dehydration and arm numbness, and an incident involving a flushing toilet that caused him significant distress. Epstein suggests he may be on the autism spectrum due to noise aversion and being 'good with numbers,' and notes he spends long days in conferences with his attorneys.
This document appears to be a page from a political analysis or op-ed article (page 15) discussing the geopolitical complexities of the Syrian conflict. It analyzes the roles of Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the US, specifically praising US Ambassador Robert Ford's 'soft power' visit to Hama. The author, identified as a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (likely Ed Husain), concludes that despite the tyranny, Assad may currently be the 'least worst option.' The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a written defense by an academic (likely Lawrence Krauss, based on the specific mention of ASU, ANU, and the nature of the allegations) addressing a report about sexual misconduct. The writer refutes allegations of inappropriate touching during a selfie at a conference in November 2016, citing investigations by both Arizona State University (ASU) and Australian National University (ANU) that found the claims not credible. The writer argues the complaints were third-party hearsay and provides context regarding their aversion to camera flashes.
A report or note sent to the writer outlining allegations, to which this document is a response.
Mrs. Kennedy insisting on the veracity of what she saw on Air Force One.
Report absolving the writer of wrongdoing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity