Eli Lilly

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
Eli Lilly and Company Eli Lilly & Co.

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017891.jpg

This document is page 826 from the 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series. It appears to be part of a judicial opinion in the case 'Burnett I' (likely Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp.), concerning liability for the September 11 attacks. The text discusses legal standards for 'proximate cause,' 'concerted action liability' (conspiracy/aiding and abetting) under New York law, the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), and civil RICO claims. It analyzes whether providing material support to al Qaeda creates liability for the 9/11 attacks. While the Bates stamp indicates it was produced to the House Oversight Committee, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.

Legal opinion / case law (federal supplement)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023088.jpg

This document is a page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch equity strategy report dated January 29, 2017. It contains two tables analyzing S&P 500 companies: one listing companies with high effective tax rates and low foreign sales, and another listing companies likely to benefit from repatriation due to high overseas cash reserves (e.g., Apple, Microsoft, Cisco). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023088' stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.

Financial research report (equity strategy)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023076.jpg

This document is a page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch equity strategy report dated January 29, 2017. It analyzes the impact of the 2004 Homeland Investment Act (HIA), specifically detailing how 15 major corporations (including Pfizer, Merck, and HP) repatriated billions in offshore funds but subsequently reduced US workforces and R&D spending while increasing share buybacks. The document includes data tables sourced from the IRS and a US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations survey, stamped with the file ID HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023076.

Financial research report / equity strategy document
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity