| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Witness's Father
|
Adversarial litigants |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness's Father
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul
|
Spouse |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A 'contempt motion that your mother filed against your father regarding your fifty million-dollar... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contempt motion was filed. | Court (implied) | View |
This is page 50 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Witness A. Farmer testifies under direct examination by Ms. Pomerantz about a weekend trip to Epstein's ranch (identifiable by the description of a 'western movie set'). Farmer testifies that she believed Epstein and Maxwell were romantic partners based on their intimate behavior and confirms that she stayed in a 'small residence' on the property with only Epstein and Maxwell.
This document is page 24 of a court transcript (Document 759, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. The witness testifies about her family's financial struggles during her youth, her mother's employment at Owen Company, and introduces her older sister, Maria Farmer, who was a painter living in Manhattan at the time.
This document is page 78 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The defense attorney questions Farmer to establish that Ghislaine Maxwell had no involvement in the logistics, funding, or encouragement of Farmer's trip to New York. The witness confirms she had no knowledge of, communication with, or contact with Maxwell prior to arriving in New York.
This is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 87) involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The text captures a contentious exchange between the lawyers regarding objections and procedure. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they or their mother have spoken to or received money from reporters; the witness answers 'No' to the questions regarding themselves.
This page is a transcript of a deposition involving a female witness being questioned by Mr. Tein while being defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness testifies that her mother and sister have not spoken to reporters ('zero'), but she cannot speak for her father and stepmother as she does not contact them. The exchange becomes heated when the attorneys argue over the line of questioning, with Mr. Tein telling Mr. Leopold to 'Be quiet' and Mr. Leopold threatening to leave if professional conduct is not maintained.
This page is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned about family members (mother, sister, and mother's husband Paul) living in Georgia. The questioning shifts to whether the witness discussed 'Epstein's case' with Paul, and specifically if they discussed 'what happened in Mr. Epstein's house' with an individual named Brett Albritton, to which the witness confirms Brett knows the basics.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about the credibility of their parents, specifically establishing that the witness's father served two years in federal prison for financial fraud and stealing from a financial institution. Opposing counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, leading to an accusation of witness coaching from Mr. Tein.
This document is a page from a sworn statement detailing the witness's traumatic experiences with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 1996. It describes alleged sexual misconduct involving the witness's younger sister, a sexual assault against the witness at Leslie Wexner's Ohio mansion, subsequent false imprisonment, and the reporting of these crimes to the FBI. The text also outlines the harassment and career destruction the witness faced from Epstein and Maxwell after reporting the assault.
This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about an incident at Jeff Epstein's house three years prior. The witness confirms they previously told police they did not have sex with Epstein and maintains this denial, while also being questioned about a fifty-million-dollar civil complaint they filed against him.
This document is page 5 of a legal deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her living situation. She confirms she lives with her aunt and uncle after her father, who filed a $50 million lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, kicked her out around Thanksgiving. The questioning also probes her relationship with her 'firefighter boyfriend' and plans to move in with him, which she indicates are not immediate.
This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details a victim's statement about being paid $200 to give a massage to Jeffrey Epstein, during which he allegedly grabbed her buttocks. The document also describes events following the initial police interview, including attempts by Epstein's associates to contact the victim, the provision of a rental car by Epstein, and instructions given to the victim to not cooperate with the police.
A conversation between the witness and her mother is the source of the hearsay testimony that the Court is ruling inadmissible. The mother allegedly told the witness who would be on the trip.
Question confirms this call did NOT happen.
JE's employees would call the mother's cellphone number.
A witness's mother left a voicemail for Sgt Frick stating she had spoken with her daughter and had information about what happened at Jeff's house.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity