Stinson
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000-06-09 | N/A | New Hampshire governor vetoes inheritance tax repeal; IRS rules on '5 & 5' trust power (PLR 20002... | New Hampshire | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021339.jpg
This legal document is a page from a report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) analyzing former U.S. Attorney Acosta's handling of the Epstein case. OPR concludes that Acosta's decision to approve a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Epstein, which included an 18-month state sentence and a provision not to prosecute unidentified 'potential co-conspirators,' did not violate a clear and unambiguous Department policy and therefore did not constitute professional misconduct. The report distinguishes between 'transactional immunity' and 'use immunity' in its analysis of the agreement's terms.
DOJ-OGR-00021329.jpg
This document appears to be page 129 of a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, filed within the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text analyzes legal precedents (such as *United States v. Marquez* and *State v. Frazier*) to establish that plea agreements involving promises of leniency toward third parties are generally valid and do not constitute an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. It also establishes that the five attorneys subject to this OPR investigation were evaluated under the local rules of the Southern District of Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00010571.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for a significant prison sentence (360 to 660 months) for a defendant convicted of sexually exploiting underage girls. It refutes the defendant's arguments for a lighter sentence by citing legal precedents (Stinson, Sash) that prioritize the plain text of sentencing guidelines over conflicting commentary. A footnote dismisses the defendant's comparison of her potential sentence to that of Epstein's as a flawed argument based on different guideline structures.
DOJ-OGR-00010435.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2022, argues against applying the sentencing guideline ยง 4B1.5 to Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that the guideline is intended only for recidivist sex offenders who pose a continuing danger to the public, which they claim Ms. Maxwell is not. Applying the guideline would allegedly contradict the intent of Congress and the Sentencing Commission, improperly add over 10 years to her sentence, and lead to an absurd result.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022342.jpg
This document is a page from a table of contents for a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics', identified by the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022342. It lists significant US tax-related events, court cases, and IRS rulings from January to September 2000, covering topics like estate tax, inheritance tax, and tax law interpretations. Although the user prompt described it as 'Epstein-related', the document itself contains no mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, his known associates, or related activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity