The author responds to a series of complaints and allegations regarding their conduct, specifically denying harassment claims and providing context for interactions with students and colleagues. The document details defenses against specific items (1 through 6), explains professional relationships at Case Western and ASU, and asserts that the author's integrity is validated by their continued employment and invitations to speak at organizations like CFI.
This document is a detailed written rebuttal by a male academic (likely Lawrence Krauss based on biographical details like the move from Case to ASU to ANU) responding to specific allegations of misconduct numbered 1 through 6. The author denies the allegations, clarifying that a 'female companion' was his wife, describing a student relationship as professional mentorship, and citing university investigations (ASU and ANU) that cleared him of wrongdoing regarding a 2016 'selfie' incident. The text highlights the author's frustration with anonymous third-party complaints and alleged violations of confidentiality agreements regarding past HR matters.
This document is a detailed rebuttal written by a high-profile scientist/professor (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss by context) responding to a list of sexual harassment allegations provided by a reporter or investigator. The author systematically denies or clarifies six specific items, including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual/platonic, and a 2008 complaint by a student at Case Western Reserve University which he argues was informal and resolved. He also references investigations by ASU and ANU which he claims cleared him of wrongdoing regarding third-party anonymous complaints.
This document is a draft email written by Lawrence Krauss on December 10, 2017, responding to a reporter or investigator regarding multiple allegations of sexual harassment. Krauss categorically denies the allegations, offering specific rebuttals to numbered 'items,' including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual and stopped politely, and a complaint by a former student at Case Western Reserve University which he claims was resolved informally with no finding of harassment. He argues that his high profile invites scrutiny but asserts his behavior has always been professional.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity