Wigmore
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00008368.jpg
This legal document, part of a court case and addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that any potential attorney-client privilege regarding statements about a person named Carolyn was waived. The argument posits that because Mr. Scarola disclosed this information to the government, the confidentiality required for privilege was broken. The document cites multiple legal precedents to support the claim that this voluntary disclosure to a third party (the government) results in the forfeiture of the privilege, which is relevant for assessing Carolyn's credibility as she testifies against Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00008209.jpg
This legal document, dated December 3, 2021, is a filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The author argues that Ms. Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Mr. Glassman as a witness to question him about advice he gave to a person named Jane regarding cooperation with the government. The argument posits that any attorney-client privilege was waived when Mr. Glassman disclosed this advice, and that this testimony is crucial for Ms. Maxwell's defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017334.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context and style) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the complexities of 'he-said, she-said' rape allegations, using the 2011 Dominic Strauss-Kahn case as a primary example to illustrate false reporting and credibility issues. The author describes teaching a law class on the subject, inviting the victim's lawyer to speak, and debating the ethical standards for prosecutors when a victim's credibility is in doubt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017145.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or legal manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of clerking for Judge Bazelon). It discusses a specific legal case (Miller v. US, 1963) involving a wallet theft of $14, focusing on the legal theory concerning 'flight' (fleeing the scene) as evidence of guilt. The author contrasts traditional legal views (Wigmore) with psychoanalytic perspectives (Freud) to argue that fleeing can be a neurotic reaction rather than proof of a crime. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity