The government
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
24
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Representative |
17
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
68 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
65 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
13
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Representative |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
organization
the defense
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
victims
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Witness prosecution |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness prosecution |
8
Strong
|
4 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trial | The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where she was convicted of Mann Act offenses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The document provides instructions for the jury on how to deliberate on the six separate counts a... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Brian met with the government long before the trial began. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hearing | An initial bail hearing was held where the Government expressed doubt about the defendant's repor... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court order | Parties are ordered to confer and prepare a stipulation that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 5... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Trial | The future trial for which the defense is preparing and requesting information. | Court | View |
| N/A | Trial | Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, which resulted in convictions that are now being challenged in this mo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The upcoming trial for which the government is seeking pre-trial notice of evidence from the defe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A criminal trial where the Court gave instructions to the jury regarding charges against the Defe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Argument being made in favor of granting bond to Ms. Maxwell. | United States | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A Detention Hearing where the Government informed the Court about the seized diamonds and cash. | Court | View |
| N/A | Interview | Witness A. Farmer met with the government approximately five or six times since the initial 2019 ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government's case against Ms. Maxwell, which is alleged to be based entirely on the testimony... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The government is investigating the circumstances surrounding the purchase of a property in New H... | New Hampshire | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The government issued a grand jury subpoena to obtain evidence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal preparation | The defendant reviews discovery materials provided by the Government and her defense counsel usin... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding for which this pre-trial motion's table of contents is prepared. | The Court | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The document outlines motions to preclude evidence or argument about current or prior investigati... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding / trial | Discussion of procedures for providing trial exhibits (slides) to the public following closing ar... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's motion regarding Juror No. 50's conduct, leading to a discussion about an evidentia... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The document outlines the rules for handling Confidential Information during the course of procee... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal conference | A conference held on November 23rd where the limiting instruction was previously discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Bail hearing | A bail hearing where the government touted flight records as evidence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Pre-trial motion regarding the admissibility of evidence for Ms. Maxwell's defense. | Court | View |
031.pdf
A legal letter from attorney Marc Fernich to Judge Richard Berman defending Jeffrey Epstein regarding a foreign passport found in his possession. The defense argues the passport, which bore a non-Jewish name, was given to Epstein by a friend for protection against hijacking and was never actually used for travel. The letter asserts Epstein is solely a US citizen and requests the original document be brought to court for inspection.
EFTA00037849.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 8, 2019, between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Assistant United States Attorney's office and Pretrial Services regarding the processing of Jeffrey Epstein. The emails coordinate the transfer of information, including the sealed indictment (19 Cr. 490), Epstein's date of birth (1/20/53), and the Government's intent to seek detention. Notably, it references a search warrant executed 'this weekend' (prior to July 8) at Epstein's residence where 'images' were discovered.
EFTA00030148.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorney Andrew Patel and likely the US Attorney's Office regarding the Epstein case. The discussion centers on the Government's obligation to produce notes from a meeting with Patel's client (whose name is redacted) to the defense counsel. Patel argues that his client is not a witness, the information is not Brady material (exculpatory evidence), and that revealing his client's identity or the fact that he met with the Government could compromise his safety. Patel notes that an 'error' made by his client is contradicted by surveillance video evidence.
EFTA00029695.pdf
An email thread from May 2021 regarding the legal proceedings of Ghislaine Maxwell. Her attorney, David Oscar Markus, notifies prosecutors of his intent to file a renewed bond motion in the Second Circuit following a ruling on conditions of confinement. The prosecutors (internal email) discuss confusion over this strategy, noting the previous ruling was about sleeping conditions, not bail.
EFTA00028203.pdf
This document is an email dated November 6, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Nathan at NYSD Chambers. The email concerns the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and submits a letter regarding 'Minor Victim-3' along with proposed redactions. Defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00027648.pdf
An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.
EFTA00027162.pdf
An email chain from April 21, 2021, between attorneys Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner), Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger regarding compliance with an order from Judge Nathan. McCawley requests confirmation to send specific documents and redactions related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case to the Government. Pagliuca forwards the relevant PDF attachments, noting they were missing from a previous email.
EFTA00026636.pdf
An email exchange dated July 8, 2019, regarding the arrival of Jeffrey Epstein at Pretrial Services. Government officials discuss his pedigree information and coordinate the unsealing of indictment 19_Cr._490, explicitly stating that the Government will be seeking detention. The emails confirm Epstein's date of birth as 1/20/53.
EFTA00024706.pdf
This document contains an email thread and the text of a Court Order dated May 14, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Maxwell's request to stop flashlight checks performed by guards every 15 minutes, accepting the Government's explanation that these are necessary security protocols for a high-profile inmate housed alone. However, the Judge urged the MDC to consider whether sleep disruptions could be reduced and to ensure protocols remain neutral and necessary.
EFTA00024512.pdf
This document contains an email thread from December 2019 between the United States Attorney's Office (implied) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). The estate's counsel requests search warrant inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties and proposes a meeting to discuss the government's potential forfeiture claims. The government response notes that the criminal case is 'now-defunct,' directs them to discovery previously provided to defense counsel (referencing specific Bates numbers), and clarifies that the government had not searched the New Mexico property.
EFTA00023037.pdf
An email chain from October 12, 2021, in which attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim informs recipients (likely MDC officials) that the government has sent a hard drive to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ghislaine Maxwell via Federal Express. Sternheim emphasizes that the hard drive must be given to Maxwell immediately upon arrival as time is of the essence.
EFTA00021898.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 9-12, 2020, between defense attorneys (Jeff Pagliuca, Nicole Simmons, Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen) and the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY regarding a discovery dispute. The defense is pressing for a quick response to an August 9th letter, citing a tight schedule with the Circuit and threatening to advise Judge Nathan if they do not receive a response sooner than the Government's proposed date of August 13th. The correspondence also notes technical email issues at the defense firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman.
EFTA00020572.pdf
An email dated February 7, 2020, between USANYS personnel containing a transcript of a Q&A session. The text discusses the post-death investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, with an official confirming that the investigation is moving forward to target co-conspirators who assisted him.
EFTA00020119.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Epstein's defense lawyers (Weinberg, Miller, Weingarten) dated August 22, 2019 (shortly after Epstein's death). The email discusses a scheduled call regarding civil forfeiture and formally requests that the defense team return or certify the destruction of all discovery materials due to the expected 'nolle order' (dismissal of charges due to death). The prosecution aims to advise the Court at an upcoming Tuesday hearing that no discovery obligations remain.
EFTA00019470.pdf
An email dated July 13, 2020, from a U.S. Pretrial Services Officer in the Southern District of New York regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The email attaches a bail report (filename: 6653181._Maxwell,_Ghislaine.pdf) and notes that Maxwell is scheduled for a remote appearance the following day. It includes strict confidentiality warnings citing Local Rule 57.1 and Title 18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1).
EFTA00019437.pdf
An email dated November 19, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the case 'US v. Maxwell'. The email conveys a letter motion submitted by the Government temporarily under seal. Key participant names and contact details are redacted.
EFTA00019140.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 1, 2020, addressing the harsh confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim describes the conditions as including cold, moisture, and sewage stench, and notes that Maxwell has been denied a blanket and a cup for water. She compares this treatment unfavorably to her experience with terrorism and capital murder suspects in supermax facilities.
EFTA00016303.pdf
This document is an email sent on September 5, 2020, to Judge Freeman's chambers regarding the civil case 'Doe v. Indyke, et al.' The email submits an attached letter from the Government supporting a stay in the proceedings. The sender and other recipients are redacted.
EFTA00015968.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 17, 2020, between defense counsel (Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger) and government prosecutors regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' in attachments). The defense provides a proposed Protective Order and argues for specific terms, including the removal of a 'Highly Confidential' designation and the provision of a laptop to Maxwell in the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) so she can review discovery materials, as in-person legal visits were not allowed at the time. The email emphasizes the defense's desire to avoid trying the case in the press and cites concerns about witness harassment.
EFTA00014884.pdf
An email dated November 24, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' case (implied by context and case number 20cr330). The email discusses the procedure for filing proposed redactions related to expert testimony and sealing specific exhibits, referencing Docket No. 495. Several attachments containing proposed redactions and responses are included.
EFTA00014649.pdf
A digital calendar entry for November 21, 2021, serving as a reminder for a legal filing deadline related to Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in a court case (likely US v. Maxwell). The entry quotes a court order requiring the Government to reply to a defense argument that a specific witness ('Employee-1') cannot authenticate the exhibit because a former employee (name redacted) allegedly removed the document from Epstein's property previously.
EFTA00014581.pdf
An email dated July 31, 2019, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Marc Fernich, Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and Michael Miller regarding case 19 Cr. 490 (Epstein). The email notifies counsel that the first discovery production has been loaded onto a drive and is ready for pickup at the Government's office, specifically in an envelope marked for Michael Miller.
EFTA00014478.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from July 16, 2019, between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York. The emails discuss a legal filing and quote a specific defense argument explaining Jeffrey Epstein's possession of an expired Austrian passport. The defense claims Epstein acquired the passport in the 1980s for personal protection against hijackers while traveling in the Middle East as an affluent Jewish man.
EFTA00011402.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between government prosecutors and an attorney representing nine potential Epstein/Maxwell victims. Following Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest, the attorney contacted the government stating that at least one client, who had previously refused to cooperate in January 2020, was now 'ready to help.' The government requests client names and filed lawsuits to conduct conflict checks and proposes scheduling an 'attorney proffer' to gather information.
EFTA00011113.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell). The correspondence is between the Judge's chambers (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), Defense Counsel (Bobbi C. Sternheim), and the US Attorney's Office. The discussion concerns the filing of a Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire, requests to seal documents, and the Court's request for copies of Jencks Act material (evidence regarding government witnesses).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity