Jury Assembly Room

Location
Mentions
26
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
13

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00009901.pdf

Court order filed on April 19, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell scheduled for April 23, 2021. The document outlines logistical details including COVID-19 protocols (masks, temperature checks), public access via overflow rooms and teleconference, and prohibitions on recording. It also sets deadlines for the Government and Defense to notify the court regarding the attendance of victims and the defendant's family members.

Court order
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00001886.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020. The judge justifies holding the proceeding with COVID-19 safety restrictions, citing a national emergency and public safety, before turning to the arraignment on an S1 superseding indictment. The judge then begins to question counsel, Ms. Moe, about the specifics of this new indictment compared to the original.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001540.jpg

This document is a court order filed on July 7, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330). It schedules an arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, to be conducted via remote video due to COVID-19 protocols. The order outlines specific restrictions on video participation to essential parties only, while noting that public viewing will be available at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to the high public interest in the case.

Court order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001013.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, where the judge justifies holding the proceeding with COVID-19 safety measures, referencing a national emergency and ensuring public trial rights are upheld. The judge then transitions to the arraignment, confirming with counsel Ms. Moe that it is for an S1 superseding indictment and asking for an explanation of the changes from the original indictment.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000846.jpg

This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing filings and orders related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment against Maxwell, motions for attorneys to appear on her behalf, and a detailed court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the procedures for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order also outlines public and media access to the proceedings via telephone and a limited-capacity video feed at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020655.jpg

This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 16 to April 19, 2021. It details various motions to dismiss and suppress evidence filed by Maxwell's defense team, orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting an arraignment date for April 23, 2021, and procedural orders regarding the severance of perjury counts and the handling of redacted documents. The document highlights the legal maneuvering regarding the S2 Superseding Indictment and disputes over evidence obtained via subpoena.

Court docket / filing log (sdny cm/ecf)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020517.jpg

This document is a court docket page (Page 31 of 92) listing entries from April 16 to April 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several filings by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca) including motions to dismiss counts of the superseding indictment and suppress evidence. Key orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan schedule an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment for April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, sever perjury counts for a separate trial, and request government intent regarding the use of disputed subpoenaed documents.

Court docket / case log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020416.jpg

This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering April 16-19, 2021. It details various filings including defense motions to dismiss indictments and suppress evidence (specifically mentioning 'Martindell' issues and protective orders), and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment. The document also notes the scheduling of separate trials for perjury and non-perjury counts.

Court docket / case log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020395.jpg

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from July 9 to July 15, 2020. It details the arraignment held on July 14, 2020, where Maxwell pleaded Not Guilty via video conference due to COVID-19 protocols, and Judge Alison J. Nathan denied bail, remanding Maxwell to custody. The docket also records attorney appearances for the defense (Cohen, Everdell, Pagliuca) and sets the trial date for July 12, 2021.

Court docket sheet / case log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001885.jpg

This page is a transcript from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 10, 2020. The Court is establishing logistical protocols for a hearing on pretrial detention, citing COVID-19 as a reason for specific remote access arrangements. The Judge details provisions for video feeds for the press and audio lines for the public (1,000 callers), alleged victims, and the defendant's family.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019465.jpg

This document is a court docket report from July 2020 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). It details the filing of a superseding indictment, notices of appearance by Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), and a Pro Hac Vice motion for attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca. It also includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting a briefing schedule and establishing protocols for a remote arraignment and bail hearing on July 14, 2020, including teleconference access numbers and COVID-19 safety measures for physical attendance.

Court docket report / case log (pacer)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019253.jpg

This document is a page from the court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated September 9, 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan detailing procedures for public and media access to hearings via phone and video feed, given COVID-19 restrictions. The docket entries list filings from mid-July 2020, including attorney appearances for Maxwell, motions regarding her detention, and a minute entry for her arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty, was denied bail, and remanded into custody.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019723.jpg

This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8 to July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear on Maxwell's behalf, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The order specifies how the public, press, victims, and legal counsel can access the proceedings via teleconference and limited in-person viewing.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity