| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jonathan Farkas
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elisa New
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Woody
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Quora
|
Subscriber service |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conversation on a plane | Airplane | View |
This is a page from a deposition transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (filed Dec 9, 2021). Maxwell is being questioned about a specific document containing contact information that a redacted individual turned over to the FBI, claiming it came from her computer. Maxwell denies recollection of the document and states she was not responsible for updating or keeping records of individuals Jeffrey Epstein hired.
This document is a printout of an email thread between cognitive scientist Joscha Bach and Jeffrey Epstein from July 2016. Bach apologizes to Epstein for an argument that occurred earlier that day involving Noam Chomsky, discussing the nuances of their disagreement regarding linguistics and cognitive development theories. The email contains controversial racial theories regarding cognitive development and references Joi Ito's views on public communication.
This document is an excerpt (pages 91-92) from a manuscript, likely Virginia Giuffre's memoir, marked as confidential evidence. It details the narrator getting lost near Epstein's ranch, discovering indigenous artifacts, and being warned by Epstein to keep the discovery secret to prevent government seizure of the land. It follows her travel to New York via Albuquerque, where she engages in banter with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell regarding aliens and her time in the wilderness, while noting Maxwell's lack of morals and seriousness regarding 'work'.
Bach apologizes for being an 'embarrassment' during a meeting/argument that day involving Noam (Chomsky). He discusses cognitive science theories, contrasting Chomsky's views with his own regarding genetic switches vs. specific circuits. He makes controversial claims regarding race, motor development, and cognitive development in US children.
Discusses communication strategies, referencing 'Joi' (likely Ito). Discusses an unnamed individual (possibly Joi or Noam) who uses students to write speeches and rewards them with acknowledgement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity