ACLU
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Author
|
Former board member supporter |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ABC
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the author
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-04-02 | N/A | Filing of a brief in the Franklin case | Legal Court | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | ACLU asked a federal judge to block enforcement of a policy banning reading materials other than ... | South Carolina | View |
| 1974-01-01 | N/A | ACLU established a specific entity/initiative (text cuts off). | USA | View |
| 1960-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of a death-penalty litigation project by the ACLU and NAACP. | USA | View |
EFTA00030767.pdf
This document is a Public Policy Law360 email newsletter dated July 20, 2021, summarizing various legal and policy news stories. Crucially, it includes a report that Ghislaine Maxwell owes the New York State Tax Department nearly $1.6 million, identifying her as a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein. Other topics include the confirmation of Tiffany Cunningham as a Federal Circuit judge, a potential $30M fine for Robinhood, and various other legislative and judicial updates.
EFTA00029606.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019867.jpg
This document appears to be a social diary or newsletter entry from February 2017 (Oscar season), likely written by publicist Peggy Siegal (identified by the 'PEG-FILM' license plate). It details various high-profile Hollywood events, including a Haiti benefit, an A24 party, a UTA political rally protesting the Trump travel ban, and a sustainability dinner hosted by the Firths. The text highlights interactions with numerous celebrities like Meryl Streep, Damien Chazelle, and Barry Jenkins regarding their Oscar prospects.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019818.jpg
This document is page 330 of a selected bibliography from a book, likely produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019818). The page lists various articles published between 2010 and 2015, primarily focusing on Edward Snowden, the NSA leaks, WikiLeaks, and cybersecurity. While the document bears a file name starting with 'Epst' (possibly referring to Epstein in a larger production batch), the text itself is entirely focused on the Snowden saga and intelligence leaks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019809.jpg
This document is page 321 from the endnotes of a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein given the file name and context) regarding Edward Snowden. It lists sources for pages 169-182 of the main text, citing interviews with anonymous NSA and Senate Intelligence Committee officials, as well as articles from the Guardian, RT, NYT, and The Intercept between 2013 and 2016. The notes cover Snowden's legal representation, his time in Russia and Hong Kong, and media coverage by Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019804.jpg
This document is page 316 of a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename/ISBN) containing endnotes for Chapter 13, 'The Great Divide'. The notes reference various sources regarding Edward Snowden's leaks, his life in Moscow, and comparisons to other leak cases, specifically the prosecution of General David Petraeus for sharing classified info with his mistress Paula Broadwell. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019776.jpg
This document is page 288 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename and header). The text discusses Edward Snowden's motivations, rejecting the idea that he destroyed data before going to Russia, and analyzing his transition from whistleblower to espionage suspect. It details his work at Booz Allen Hamilton in Hawaii and his contact with journalists Greenwald, Poitras, and Gellman. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence in a Congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019758.jpg
This document is a page from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019758). The text details an interview between the author and Snowden's Russian lawyer, Kucherena, discussing Snowden's potential possession of CIA files, the division of labor between his legal teams (Kucherena in Russia, Ben Wizner/ACLU in the US), and Snowden's financial state upon arriving in Russia. The document clarifies that media access to Snowden was controlled by Ben Wizner.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019665.jpg
This document is page 177 from a book (likely 'Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales' based on the ISBN in the footer file name) included in House Oversight Committee evidence. The text details the legal complexities facing Edward Snowden, specifically the challenges his lawyer Ben Wizner (ACLU) faced in securing amnesty or a plea deal with the DOJ. It discusses the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, the strategic damage caused by Snowden fleeing to Russia, and Wizner's role as a gatekeeper for media access to Snowden.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019605.jpg
This document is a page (page 117) from a book titled 'The Great Divide' (likely referring to a chapter title within a book about Snowden), processed as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses the legal precedents set by the Obama administration regarding government whistleblowers/leakers, specifically citing the convictions of Manning, Kiriakou, and others as warnings that Snowden likely ignored. It contrasts the legal view of these actions as lawbreaking with the moral view held by supporters and Snowden's lawyer, Ben Wizner, who frame the actions as civil disobedience against surveillance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019597.jpg
This document is page 109 from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer), which is part of a House Oversight Committee file. The text details Edward Snowden's time in Russia, his asylum, the risks taken by his associates like Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange, and his subsequent media appearances and financial earnings ($20,000 from TED). It critiques Snowden's transition from a technician to a media figure and his rhetoric regarding facing prison versus escaping to Russia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017442.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir by Alan Dershowitz (marked page 355), possibly submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It contains a testimonial from a reader who changed their anti-Zionist views after reading Dershowitz's book 'The Case for Israel,' followed by Dershowitz reflecting on his political identity as a liberal Democrat and his work with the ACLU despite being attacked for his defense of Israel. The document lists prominent Democrats and civil rights figures with whom Dershowitz claims political alignment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017414.jpg
This document appears to be a page (327) from a manuscript or book draft, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text details the author's 1985 criticism of the United Nations' 'blacklist' of entertainers who performed in South Africa during apartheid, labeling it 'reverse McCarthyism.' It references specific celebrities included on the list (such as Frank Sinatra and Queen) and concludes with an anecdote about corresponding with filmmaker Woody Allen regarding the issue.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017401.jpg
This document appears to be page 314 of a manuscript or book draft (dated 4.2.12 with a word count) analyzing the political and legal history of the US Supreme Court, specifically contrasting desegregation with the abortion debate. The text argues that while the Court successfully unblocked democracy regarding desegregation, the *Roe v. Wade* decision had 'disastrous' long-term consequences by galvanizing the Religious Right and causing the pro-choice movement to become politically lethargic. It references ACLU data regarding public opinion shifts between 1967 and 1972.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017249.jpg
This document is page 162 of a manuscript, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text appears to be written by Alan Dershowitz (identified by the claim of being the clerk who drafted the 'Rudolph' opinion for Justice Goldberg). It discusses the legal history of the death penalty for rape, specifically the backlash from the Georgia Supreme Court against federal intervention, scholarly criticism from Herbert Packer, and the subsequent formation of a litigation project by the ACLU and NAACP.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017243.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft essay or manuscript, likely written by Alan Dershowitz (given the style and context of the Epstein files, though his name is not explicitly on this page), dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses the philosophy of the First Amendment, praising groups that defend speech they oppose while criticizing the ACLU for failing to defend right-wing or controversial speech on college campuses. It bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017225.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context of House Oversight documents) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal and ethical implications of the 'Irvine Ten' case, where students were prosecuted for disrupting a speech by Ambassador Michael Oren at the University of California. The author argues that prosecuting the students was necessary to protect First Amendment rights and the open marketplace of ideas, criticizing the ACLU's stance on the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017224.jpg
This page, stamped with House Oversight markings, discusses a controversy at Irvine (UC Irvine) regarding the disruption of a speech by Ambassador Oren by Muslim Union students (likely the 'Irvine 11' incident). The text critiques ACLU leaders Chuck Anderson and Hector Villagro for signing a letter that failed to condemn the censorship, contrasting their stance with Dean Chemerinsky, who argued the disruption was not protected free speech. The author argues that failing to prosecute or discipline the students encourages further censorship of pro-Israel speakers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017223.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report or book (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context and style, though not explicitly named) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details an incident where the Muslim Student Union disrupted a speech by Ambassador Oren, leading to criminal charges by the District Attorney. The author criticizes local ACLU leaders for defending the disruptors and framing the censorship as a peaceful protest, contrasting this with the author's own long history of supporting the ACLU and free speech.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017222.jpg
This document discusses the distinction between the First Amendment right to heckle a speaker versus silencing them entirely, referencing the Bruce Franklin case involving Henry Cabot Lodge at Stanford in 1971. It contrasts the ACLU's past defense of limited disruption with a later refusal by the Southern California branch to apply the same principles during a disruption of Michael Oren's speech at the University of California at Irvine.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017221.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir by Alan Dershowitz, submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017221). It details Dershowitz's historical defense of a professor named Franklin at Stanford University, his collaboration with research assistant Joel Klein, and his public conflict with Stanford President Lyman regarding First Amendment rights. The text describes the Faculty Committee's decision to fire Franklin for urging students to occupy a computation center and Dershowitz's subsequent lecture criticizing the faculty's stance on civil liberties.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017219.jpg
This document appears to be a draft page (dated April 2, 2012) from a book manuscript, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific anecdote about Skokie and his mother. The text is 'Chapter 8' and discusses First Amendment rights, specifically the 'fighting words' doctrine. The author recounts their involvement in the Skokie case, where they urged the ACLU to defend the rights of neo-Nazis to march, arguing against censorship even for offensive speech. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017208.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or legal narrative, likely by Alan Dershowitz (referenced in the footnote), produced during House Oversight proceedings. The text recounts the author's legal work during the Vietnam War era, specifically his involvement in high-profile First Amendment and anti-war protest cases, including the defense of the Chicago 7 lawyer William Kunstler, Harvard students, and Stanford professor Bruce Franklin. It details the author's perspective on the conflict between national security and civil liberties during that period.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017207.jpg
This document appears to be a page (pg. 120) from a draft manuscript or book, likely written by a legal scholar or philosopher, evidenced by the 'WC' (Word Count) header. The text discusses the tension between national security and civil liberties, arguing that the judiciary is best suited to balance these interests during crises. It is marked with a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017207', indicating it was produced as part of a US House of Representatives Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027122.jpg
A transcript page from an interview between individuals identified as 'DP' and 'TB', marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The conversation focuses on the sociopolitical dynamics of Islam in the United States and Europe, alleging cooperation between the American Left (specifically citing the ACLU and SPLC) and Islamist agendas. The dialogue also covers the decline of Christianity in Europe versus the US and touches on the geopolitical stability of Algeria.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity