This document is an email chain from December 2020 between unidentified individuals (likely a legal team) discussing the status of a subpoena served to the Jeffrey Epstein Estate. The discussion centers on a news article reporting that the Estate must share private videos recorded at Epstein's properties. The participants are trying to recall the status of the estate's compliance with their request for these materials.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa, filed on August 10, 2022. Espinosa testifies that Ghislaine's role was that of an 'estate manager' for Jeffrey Epstein, responsible for his properties. The witness distinguishes this role from that of Epstein's finance people and attorneys, stating that to their knowledge, Ghislaine was not involved in those financial or business aspects of his life.
This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a submission by Sigrid S. McCawley arguing against a defendant's motion to subpoena evidence from a third party, BSF. The document contends that the requested materials—including communications, a Grand Jury subpoena, cowboy boots, and photographs involving individuals like Annie Farmer, Virginia Giuffre, and Jeffrey Epstein—are either obtainable from the government or not relevant enough to require pre-trial production. The author concludes that the defendant's motion should be denied.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity