| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Author
|
Professional influence |
5
|
1 |
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Doc 809) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against unsealing grand jury materials, claiming the Government has not met the 'special circumstances' burden. The text extensively cites the precedent 'In re Biaggi,' arguing that unsealing is only justified to correct misleading public characterizations, and suggests the Government's current motion is a 'diversion' rather than true transparency.
A page from a manuscript or book draft (dated 4.2.12 at the top) recounting the author's 50-year legal career, specifically focusing on murder cases and appellate strategies. The author (strongly implied to be Alan Dershowitz based on the mention of the Claus Von Bulow case and teaching commitments) details a technique of combining appeals with habeas corpus petitions to introduce new scientific evidence. The text also discusses the author's moral stance and experience regarding client guilt, noting that only one homicide client has ever confessed to them.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity