This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about their parents filing a police report against Mr. Epstein. The witness is evasive and claims not to know answers, while their counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, citing lack of foundation and speculation.
This document is page 98 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of lawyer Burt Ocariz and his relationship with lead federal prosecutor Marie Villafona. The questioner also asks if the witness was aware of an alleged attempt by Villafona to have Epstein pay Ocariz to represent the witness, all of which the witness denies knowing.
This document is a transcript of an interview where an individual (A) is questioned about statements provided to law enforcement. The individual confirms giving one taped statement to Detective Pagan of the police and describes a separate conversation with the FBI that took place at their father's residence on Downers Road in Loxahatchee. The interviewee is uncertain whether the FBI conversation was taped.
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In this excerpt, an unidentified witness is questioned about their preparation for the deposition, which included a meeting with a 'Mr. Leopold' that morning. The witness also confirms they have previously read police reports related to the case and clarifies that a statement they gave to the police was in the form of a narrative police report, not a question-and-answer transcript.
This document is page 88 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their mother's husband, Paul, and his potential interactions with reporters. The questioning then shifts to the witness's knowledge of a Detective Recarey and a potential deal involving cooperation against someone named Epstein, as well as any contact with people who have been to Epstein's house. The witness consistently denies any knowledge of these subjects, and their likely attorney, Mr. Leopold, makes an objection.
This document is page 83 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and the witness's father. The witness acknowledges being aware of the arrangement after it happened but denies knowing any specific details, including whether any money was actually exchanged.
This document is page 81 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of several individuals, including Tony Figueroa and Zack Bryan, and events that occurred at a house belonging to a Mr. Epstein. The witness denies knowing most of the people mentioned but confirms they know Zack Bryan, leading to further questioning about that relationship.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.
This document is page 59 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from a deposition or hearing. It details a contentious exchange between attorneys, where Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the questioning of a female witness, arguing that she has already answered the question multiple times and is being harassed. The other attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Goldberger, push back against Mr. Leopold's objections.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about how much money she hopes to receive from a Mr. Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and instructs his client not to answer, leading to a certified question.
This document is page 36 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a prior statement she made to Detective Pagan, suggesting she lied to a person named Epstein about her age. The witness denies the specific phrasing but admits to telling someone that she told Epstein she was 18, while attorneys Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold repeatedly object to the line of questioning.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, in which attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning centers on the witness's awareness of a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein by their attorney, Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, instructing his client not to reveal any information learned through their privileged attorney-client conversations.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about her living situation, confirming she lives with her aunt and uncle after being kicked out by her father around Thanksgiving of the previous year. The questioning occurs in the context of a fifty million-dollar lawsuit her father filed against Jeffrey Epstein, and it clarifies that her boyfriend, Brett Albritton, has his own apartment where she does not currently live.
This document is page 5 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. In this section, the deponent affirms they are fit to testify, states they are living with their aunt and uncle but cannot recall the address, and is questioned about a contempt motion filed by their mother. The transcript was prepared by Censor & Associates.
This document is page 149 of a transcript index from a legal proceeding, prepared by Censor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords from 'proper' to 'remember' and their corresponding page and line number locations within the full transcript. The document is part of a public records request response from the DOJ, as indicated by the footer identifier.
This document is page 143 of a concordance index from a legal transcript, prepared by the firm Censor & Associates. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'good' to 'institution' and provides the page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document references several individuals, including Hayley, Herman, Hawthorne, and GROVE, and is marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity