| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Instruction No. 21 regarding Count Four | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding 'similar acts' evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding circumstantial evidence and inferences. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing of court transcript (Document 767) containing jury instructions. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely a sentencing hearing) concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. The presiding judge rejects claims regarding Maxwell's poor treatment at the MDC, citing her extensive access to resources, and highlights a pattern of dishonesty regarding her finances and civil deposition testimony (perjury). While noting that Maxwell and her attorney, Ms. Sternheim, acknowledged the victims' suffering, the judge emphasizes that Maxwell failed to express remorse or accept responsibility for her actions.
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the sentencing hearing) for Ms. Maxwell. The judge rejects the defense's claim that Maxwell is indigent, citing her previous report of $22 million in assets and a lack of documentation regarding her marriage or divorce settlement, and states an intention to impose a fine. The judge also notes that the government is not seeking restitution and prepares to discuss sentencing guidelines after a lunch break.
This document is page 19 of a court transcript (Document 741) filed on August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It contains standard jury instructions delivered by the judge, explaining that lawyer statements and objections are not evidence, and instructing jurors to use their common sense when evaluating testimony. The page bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00011684.
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge outlines the rationale for a substantial sentence, citing the gravity of the offense, the harm to victims, and the need for general deterrence against sexual abuse and trafficking of minors. The judge emphasizes that Maxwell's wealth and status do not place her above the law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity