Juror 50's stepbrother
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 50
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness/Juror
|
Familial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Familial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Familial abuser victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Crime | Child sexual abuse of Juror 50, which occurred when he was a minor, on multiple occasions over se... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Childhood sexual abuse | Juror 50 was sexually abused by his stepbrother during his childhood. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse | Juror 50 was abused on multiple occasions by his stepbrother and one of the stepbrother's friends. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021764.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror 50 should have been disqualified from jury duty due to his failure to disclose his own history of child sexual abuse during voir dire. The document details how Juror 50's traumatic experiences, revealed in a post-verdict hearing, significantly paralleled the abuse described by the government's key witnesses at trial, suggesting he was incapable of being impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00010333.jpg
This legal document details the testimony of Juror 50, who explained that his inaccurate answers on a jury questionnaire regarding past abuse were an inadvertent mistake. He attributed the errors to being distracted by a recent breakup and commotion, rushing to finish, and misunderstanding the questions, rather than an intentional failure to disclose. The Court considered this testimony in deciding how to proceed with questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00010315.jpg
This is page 9 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated March 15, 2022, regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The document argues that 'Juror 50' was biased and answered voir dire questions (specifically Question 25 and 49) incorrectly regarding his history of sexual abuse because he does not identify as a 'victim' due to his healing process. The defense argues this psychological coping mechanism prevented accurate answers and demonstrates bias, reiterating objections to the Court's limitation on questioning the juror.
DOJ-OGR-00010310.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 649) from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, filed on March 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Maxwell. The text argues that 'Juror 50' demonstrated bias by lying on a questionnaire about his own history of sexual abuse, which the defense argues closely paralleled the abuse described by victims at the trial. The filing highlights that the juror was abused by a familiar person (his stepbrother), mirroring the allegations against Epstein and Maxwell, and argues he would have been struck for cause had he been honest.
DOJ-OGR-00010309.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 15, 2022, analyzes whether a juror, identified as Juror 50, gave false answers during jury selection (voir dire). Juror 50 answered "No" to a question about whether any family member had been accused of sexual abuse, but later admitted his stepbrother had been, and that his mother had reported it to the police. The court is now considering if this false statement satisfies the legal standard (the McDonough test) and would have provided Ms. Maxwell, a party in the case, with a valid reason to have the juror removed for cause.
DOJ-OGR-00010298.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror 50 did not intentionally lie on a jury questionnaire when he failed to disclose childhood sexual abuse. The filing explains that the juror did not consider the unprosecuted abuse a "crime" and did not initially consider his estranged stepbrother, the abuser, to be a "family member" in the context of the questions. The document contends that a lay juror's interpretation of such questions should not be held to the strict standard of a trained lawyer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity