| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01-01 | Legal case | The U.S. v. Zarger case presided over by Judge Gleeson. | Courtroom (unspecified) | View |
| 2000-01-01 | Legal case | The U.S. v. Zarger case, presided over by Judge Gleeson, which the government cited in its brief. | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, where an attorney is arguing against their client being a flight risk. The attorney distinguishes their client's case from the U.S. v. Zarger case cited by the government, noting their client was in New Hampshire at the time of arrest and not making plans to leave the country. The attorney also references a prior felony conviction of a Mr. Epstein and a previous proceeding before Judge Berman.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where an attorney argues for their client, likely concerning bail. The attorney refutes the government's claim that the client is a flight risk by distinguishing the current case from precedents like 'U.S. v. Zarger' and a prior case involving a 'Mr. Epstein', emphasizing that their client was in New Hampshire at the time of arrest and not making plans to flee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity