| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Nicolas Roos
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
This document is an email chain from June 29, 2020, coordinating the signing and swearing out of the arrest warrant and indictment for Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Parker (USMJ) communicates with redacted parties (likely prosecutors/AUSA) to schedule a call with an agent to finalize the warrant process. The attachments confirm the subject is Maxwell.
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between the SDNY Assistant United States Attorney and the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). The AUSA requests specific actions, including reviewing message pads seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residence, tracing financial transfers from Epstein to Maxwell since 2005, verifying her UK and French citizenship, and checking for property ownership. The Task Force responds with updates on TECS border system alerts (noting she hit the system three times in the past month) and negative results from property searches.
This document is an email request from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated August 13, 2019. It requests the production of defendant Efrain Reyes (Epstein's former groundskeeper) for a 'proffer' session scheduled for August 16, 2019, at 11:00 AM at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. The request was sent three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death.
This document is an email chain from February to April 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) for the Southern District of New York and an unidentified attorney who successfully litigated *United States v. Nader*. The AUSA reached out to discuss a 'retroactivity issue' relevant to a current case. The final email, dated April 17, 2021, thanks the attorney for their help and attaches 'Maxwell_Opinion.pdf,' indicating the AUSA secured a favorable ruling in the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the consultation.
This document is an email chain from February 2021 between an NYPD/FBI Task Force Detective and an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. They discuss evidence retention policies for FedEx and Victoria's Secret, review of photos of a redacted individual, and a request to the ALAT (Assistant Legal Attaché) for UK travel records involving Maxwell and Epstein.
An email exchange dated August 2, 2019, between defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Weinberg resends a document because a previous recipient was out of office, and the AUSA acknowledges receipt while requesting that three specific individuals be copied on all future correspondence.
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorneys at Edwards Pottinger LLC (Brittany Henderson and Brad Edwards) and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. They are coordinating scheduling for 'Epstein Client Meetings' which are explicitly identified as 'victim interviews' to take place on October 23 and 24, 2019, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrew's Plaza. The specific names of the victims being interviewed are redacted.
This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell). The correspondence is between the Judge's chambers (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), Defense Counsel (Bobbi C. Sternheim), and the US Attorney's Office. The discussion concerns the filing of a Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire, requests to seal documents, and the Court's request for copies of Jencks Act material (evidence regarding government witnesses).
This email chain from December 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) discusses the logistics of replacing a hard drive for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence notes that Maxwell 'recently dropped and broke' her previous drive, prompting the SDNY to send a replacement via FedEx and request the return of the damaged hardware. A letter to Judge Nathan is also referenced as an attachment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity