| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
TVPA Claims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
This document is a page from the Federal Supplement (Vol. 349, 2d Series) containing the header of a decision in the case *Lawrence Agee v. Richard Grunert, et al.* (D. Vermont, 2004). The case involves a physician suing his former partners for defamation and other torts after they reported his mental unfitness to practice; the court largely ruled in favor of the defendants, finding their statements privileged and required by ethics codes. The top of the page also contains the conclusion of a separate, unrelated case involving the 'SAAR Network' and 'Adel Batterjee' (likely the *Burnett* 9/11 litigation), and the footer indicates the document is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
This document is page 828 of a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely 'In re Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001') bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of RICO and Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) claims against various Saudi banks and individuals (including the Saudi Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) because the TVPA only applies to individuals acting under color of law, and the RICO claims failed to prove the defendants directed the enterprise. The text also introduces the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and references the September 11 attacks in a footnote. While labeled as 'Epstein-related' by the user (likely due to its inclusion in a House Oversight production regarding banking irregularities or Deutsche Bank), the text specifically concerns 9/11 litigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity