jeffrey E. (jeevacation@gmail.com)
PersonRelationship Network
Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump...
Contains a link to a water booster pump on klearwaterstore.com with the question 'passing along not covered >?'. This email is a reply to a forwarded message from Steve Bannon.
Fwd: Re:
Forwarded the email from David Rivkin with the message: 'Big deal'.
Fwd: Re:
Commented 'i htink weak thoughts?' and forwarded the email chain he received from Steve Bannon.
Re: Fwd: Re:
Responded to the forwarded chain with a dismissive legal analysis: 'Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply.'
Fwd: Re:
Forwarded the email from David Rivkin with the message: 'Big deal'.
Fwd: Re:
Commented 'i htink weak thoughts?' and forwarded the email chain he received from Steve Bannon.
Re: Fwd: Re:
Responded to the forwarded chain with a dismissive legal analysis: 'Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply.'
Re:
A reply consisting of a smiley face emoticon ': -)'.
No Subject
A reply stating, 'but maybe with the right amount of shoes his lawyer might change her mind :)', likely in response to Ruemmler's comment about Bill Clinton's lawyer.
Re:
A reply consisting of a smiley face emoticon ': -)'.
No Subject
A reply stating, 'but maybe with the right amount of shoes his lawyer might change her mind :)', likely in response to Ruemmler's comment about Bill Clinton's lawyer.
No Subject
A reply stating, 'While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)'. Also asks, 'Are you feeling better today?'. This is likely in response to Epstein's suggestion about Bill Clinton.
No Subject
Forwards an email from 'to me' dated 'Feb 24'. The forwarded content includes the name 'Steve Bannon', a link to a Politico article, and a message from Epstein: 'do you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record.'
Re:
A reply consisting of a smiley face emoticon ': -)'.
No Subject
A reply stating, 'but maybe with the right amount of shoes his lawyer might change her mind :)', likely in response to Ruemmler's comment about Bill Clinton's lawyer.
No Subject
A reply stating, 'While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)'. Also asks, 'Are you feeling better today?'. This is likely in response to Epstein's suggestion about Bill Clinton.
No Subject
Forwards an email from 'to me' dated 'Feb 24'. The forwarded content includes the name 'Steve Bannon', a link to a Politico article, and a message from Epstein: 'do you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record.'
No Subject
A reply stating, 'While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)'. Also asks, 'Are you feeling better today?'. This is likely in response to Epstein's suggestion about Bill Clinton.
No Subject
Forwards an email from 'to me' dated 'Feb 24'. The forwarded content includes the name 'Steve Bannon', a link to a Politico article, and a message from Epstein: 'do you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record.'
Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifia...
Jeffrey E. states he 'spent two hours on conference. with her yesterday. the flynn focus was clever'. This was in reply to an email from Steve Bannon.
Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably ...
Contained a link to a Politico article: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437
[Blank]
mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign
No Subject
In response to the article, wrote: "Don't you dare say to anyone (or even think) 'finally I agree with something he said'......"
No Subject
"I think he is cracking"
No Subject
"Sri Emanuel is going to go s tv series"
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity