Ms. Maxwell's father
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Familial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Family |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Death of Ms. Maxwell's father. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Death of Ms. Maxwell's father | Unspecified | View |
| 1991-01-01 | Death | The death of Ms. Maxwell's father. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018970.jpg
This document is a transcript of a sidebar conference during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense (Mr. Everdell) argues against admitting evidence regarding the death of Maxwell's father and her subsequent move to a smaller apartment, claiming it predates the alleged conspiracy by three years. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues this evidence is relevant to establish motive, specifically that Maxwell was not wealthy and participated in crimes with Jeffrey Epstein in exchange for financial support, including the purchase of a large townhouse.
DOJ-OGR-00021627.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 29, 2023. The speaker, likely her defense counsel, argues for a reasonable sentence by citing mitigating factors from her life. These factors include the traumatic accident and death of her eldest brother, the overwhelming influence of her 'narcissistic' father, and the 'controlling, demanding, manipulative' influence of Jeffrey Epstein on her adulthood.
DOJ-OGR-00013386.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring a sidebar discussion during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues that evidence of Maxwell's father's death and her subsequent financial decline—followed by Epstein buying her a townhouse—establishes a financial motive for her participation in Epstein's crimes. The defense (Mr. Everdell) objects, claiming the events occurred three years before the alleged conspiracy and are irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00010452.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from June 15, 2022, argues against harsh sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell, claiming she is a victim of public condemnation and scapegoating. It details her arrest on July 2, 2020, in New Hampshire, framing her relocation as an escape from media intrusion rather than law enforcement. The document also cites a past trauma from her childhood, where she was allegedly on an Irish Republican Army "hit list," to explain her heightened fear and need for security.
DOJ-OGR-00011612.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a sentencing hearing for Ms. Maxwell, filed on July 22, 2022. The judge discusses the factors influencing the sentence, acknowledging mitigating aspects such as Ms. Maxwell's age (over 60), lack of prior convictions, charitable work, and positive letters from family and a fellow inmate. However, the judge states that her 'decade-long pattern of predatory activity' justifies a substantial sentence, even if she is not considered a continuing danger to the public.
DOJ-OGR-00011601.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding, specifically a sentencing hearing for Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 22, 2022. The speaker, presumably her defense attorney, is arguing for a more lenient sentence by presenting mitigating factors from her life. These factors include a traumatic family tragedy involving her eldest brother's death, a difficult upbringing with a 'narcissistic, brutish, and punitive father,' and the long-term 'controlling, demanding, manipulative' influence of Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity