Jeffrey H. Sloman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matthew Menchel
|
Professional supervisor subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Lourie
|
Professional supervisor subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Professional supervisor subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Investigator subject |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-15 | N/A | Publication of Miami Herald article regarding Jeffrey Sloman defending Alexander Acosta. | Miami/Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-06-01 | Career transition | Sloman left the USAO to enter private practice. | N/A | View |
| 2010-01-01 | Appointment | The Attorney General appointed Sloman to be the Interim U.S. Attorney for the district. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-12-01 | Recusal | Acosta was formally recused from the Epstein matter, and Sloman became the senior USAO official s... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | U.S. Attorney's office representative signs the Addendum. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | US Attorney's Office (via Jeffrey Sloman/A. Marie Villafaña) signs the Addendum. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-01 | Legal action | Jeffrey H. Sloman signed an addendum to the NPA on behalf of the USAO. | N/A | View |
| 2006-10-01 | Appointment | Sloman became the FAUSA. | Miami | View |
| 1990-01-01 | Employment | Jeffrey H. Sloman joined the USAO as a line AUSA. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023321.tif
This document is a conclusion from an OPR report detailing the investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by federal prosecutors. It outlines the Miami Herald's 2018 report, the subsequent OPR investigation into the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving R. Alexander Acosta, and the findings regarding victim rights violations. The report identifies five former USAO attorneys, including Acosta, as subjects of the investigation concerning their involvement in the NPA and victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020807.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It contains a statement certifying that Epstein understands the clarifications to the NPA and agrees to comply. The document is signed by Gerald Lefcourt (Epstein's counsel) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative of the U.S. Attorney's Office (marked FAUSA) on October 30, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00021519.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It certifies that Epstein understands and agrees to comply with clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Gerald Lefcourt (Epstein's counsel) on October 29, 2007, and by Jeffrey H. Sloman (FAUSA, signing for A. Marie Villafaña) on October 30, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00021485.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report concerning the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prompted by a 2018 Miami Herald article, the OPR investigated the 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) orchestrated by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The report identifies five former federal prosecutors, including former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, as subjects of the investigation for their roles in negotiating and executing the controversial deal.
DOJ-OGR-00021205.jpg
This document outlines the professional histories and specific roles of several key figures from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) who were involved in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It details the career paths of Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, and Andrew C. Lourie within the USAO, describing their supervisory responsibilities, participation in meetings with defense counsel, and involvement in negotiating the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text also notes the career transitions of former U.S. Attorney Acosta, including his recusal from the Epstein matter and subsequent roles as Secretary of Labor and university dean.
DOJ-OGR-00003207.jpg
This document, page 31 of a DOJ report (likely the OGR report), details the professional biographies and specific roles of USAO officials Jeffrey Sloman, Matthew Menchel, and Andrew Lourie in the Epstein investigation and the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights Sloman's negotiation of an NPA addendum, Menchel's communication of the two-year plea deal, and Lourie's role in the NPA negotiations before his departure. The text also notes Alexander Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019 due to criticism regarding the Epstein case.
DOJ-OGR-00004607.jpg
This document is the conclusion section of an OPR report detailing an investigation into the USAO's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) authorized by R. Alexander Acosta. The report confirms that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by concealing the NPA from victims and sending misleading letters. It identifies five former USAO attorneys (Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, Lourie, and Villafaña) as subjects of the investigation due to their involvement in the NPA negotiations.
DOJ-OGR-00005543.jpg
This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez (Epstein's attorney) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative (FAUSA) for Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana on October 30, 2007, under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. The signatures for Jeffrey Epstein and Gerald Lefcourt are blank on this copy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018020.jpg
This document is a Letter to the Editor of the New York Times dated March 4, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys to defend the 2007 plea deal overseen by then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta. The letter argues that the plea deal was necessary due to a lack of evidence for federal crimes (such as sex trafficking or coercion) and claims the agreement achieved significant objectives including restitution and sex offender registration. The document includes court filing stamps indicating it was later used as an exhibit in a 2019 civil case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.jpg
This document is an email from Darren Indyke to 'jeevacation' (likely Epstein) and attorney Martin Weinberg, dated May 10, 2019. The body of the email is redacted for privilege, but it forwards a Miami Herald article from February 2019 regarding Jeffrey Sloman defending former prosecutor Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein plea deal. The document highlights the ongoing scrutiny of the non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023125.jpg
This document is a newspaper clipping from February 2019 detailing former prosecutor Jeffrey Sloman's public defense of Alexander Acosta regarding the lenient 2008 plea deal given to Jeffrey Epstein. Sloman attributes the deal to 'legal impediments' and terrified victims, rather than corruption or pressure from Epstein's high-profile lawyers. The article notes the reopening of a DOJ investigation into the case following the Miami Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series.
Unknown Title
Denied that Acosta capitulated to high-priced defense; cited legal impediments to federal prosecution.
Defense of Alexander Acosta
Defends the plea deal based on 'legal impediments' and denies corruption.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity