Court/Jury

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
0

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
5
1
View
No events found for this entity.
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
33
Total
33

Nature of schemes

From: the government
To: Court/Jury

Government intended to prove defendant sexually exploited underage girls through different conspiratorial schemes.

Opening statement
N/A

Maxwell's operations

From: Annie, Kate, and Jane
To: Court/Jury

Testimony from Annie, Kate, and Jane that corroborated Carolyn's account of Maxwell.

Testimony
N/A

Carolyn's activities

From: Sean
To: Court/Jury

Sean's confirmation that Carolyn went to the house to make money and interacted with Maxwell.

Testimony
N/A

Testimony about Carolyn

From: Sean
To: Court/Jury

Sean testified that Carolyn told him she started making money at Epstein's house and interacted with Maxwell there.

Conversation
N/A

Cross-examination

From: witnesses
To: Court/Jury

Defense questioning witnesses about inconsistencies in their stories regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.

Testimony
N/A

Trial evidence

From: Jane
To: Court/Jury

Jane's testimony was presented by the Government and analyzed to determine if it resulted in a constructive amendment of the indictment.

Testimony
N/A

Ms. Maxwell's involvement in sexual abuse in New York

From: Jane
To: Court/Jury

The document suggests the jury did not credit Jane's testimony regarding Ms. Maxwell's involvement in sexual abuse in New York, due to a lack of corroborating evidence.

Testimony
N/A

Household Rules

From: Mr. Alessi
To: Court/Jury

Testified that he was supposed to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb'.

Testimony
N/A

Opening/Closing Statements

From: Defense/Prosecution
To: Court/Jury

Arguments regarding the 'household manual' and Maxwell's role.

Legal arguments
N/A

First instance of abuse

From: the witness
To: Court/Jury

Testified the first time was in a pool house in Florida.

Testimony
N/A

Cross-examination

From: JANE
To: Court/Jury

Ms. Menninger asked Jane on the stand if she remembered being alone in the room with Epstein and Ghislaine.

Testimony
N/A

Maxwell's actions

From: CAROLYN
To: Court/Jury

Carolyn's testimony about Maxwell's activities, which is described as powerful evidence.

Testimony
N/A

Timeline of events

From: the government
To: Court/Jury

Describing the shift between an earlier scheme and a later pyramid scheme.

Summations
N/A

Trial Testimony

From: JANE
To: Court/Jury

Testified that Maxwell cultivated a friendship, took her shopping/movies, and instructed her on sexual acts.

Testimony
N/A

Closing Statement

From: William A. Isaacson
To: Court/Jury

Argued bank resorted to extortion.

Closing arguments
2025-11-19

Direct Examination Testimony

From: Rocchio
To: Court/Jury

Testimony explaining why adolescents aged 12-18 are statistically likely to delay disclosing sexual abuse until adulthood due to developmental factors and preference for peer communication.

Meeting
2025-01-15

Credibility of a witness's testimony against Ghislaine Ma...

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Court/Jury

Ms. Menninger argues that a witness's testimony is unreliable due to her stated lack of memory regarding key events involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, such as whether Maxwell touched or kissed her, or was present during sexual contact.

Court summation
2022-08-10

The identity of Michelle and credibility of witness Jane

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Court/Jury

Ms. Menninger argues that the Michelle being discussed is a specific person, her client, who was friends with Emmy. She refutes the government's suggestion that it could be any Michelle from an address book and attacks the credibility of a witness named Jane, accusing her of fabricating connections to people from 'Epstein's world'.

Summation
2022-08-10

Definition of Grooming

From: Dr. Rocchio
To: Court/Jury

Dr. Rocchio explains the history of grooming literature (since the 1980s) and outlines the five general stages of grooming behaviors.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Redirect Examination

From: CAROLYN
To: Court/Jury

Testimony regarding age of first contact with Maxwell/Epstein and denial of coaching or financial motive.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Allegations of sexual abuse against Epstein and the defen...

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: Court/Jury

Ms. Pomerantz outlines the facts of the case, detailing the sexual abuse committed by Epstein against teenage girls and the defendant's alleged role as an essential accomplice who recruited, groomed, and facilitated the abuse.

Opening statement
2022-08-10

Credibility of witnesses against Ghislaine Maxwell

From: Ms. Comey
To: Court/Jury

Ms. Comey argues that the four witnesses against Ghislaine Maxwell testified for justice, not for financial gain. She states they had already received 'million-dollar payouts' and would not have subjected themselves to a grueling and humiliating trial and cross-examination if their testimony were false.

Rebuttal argument
2022-08-10

Direct Examination regarding grooming and coercive control

From: Rocchio
To: Court/Jury

Witness defines coercive control and explains how the grooming process creates attachment and entrapment for victims of childhood sexual abuse.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Timeline of Annie Farmer's travels

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Court/Jury

Ms. Menninger argues that records (flight logs, border patrol records) show Annie Farmer's trips occurred in 1997 when she was almost 18, not 1996, contradicting a previous narrative.

Summation
2022-08-10

Direct Examination regarding credentials and research

From: Loftus
To: Court/Jury

Loftus describes her awards from psychological associations and explains her history of conducting hundreds of experiments on human memory.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity