| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror Payton
|
Family |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Accident | Juror Payton's son was injured in an explosion of a fire truck. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Explosion of a fire truck injuring Juror Payton's son. | Unknown | View |
This document is page 32 of a legal filing (Document 613) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It discusses legal precedents regarding juror misconduct, specifically citing the Supreme Court's decision in McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood (referenced via 'Id.' and the mention of 'Juror Payton'). The text outlines the legal standard required to obtain a new trial when a juror fails to answer voir dire questions honestly.
This legal document outlines the appellate history of a case concerning juror bias. The district court denied a new trial, the court of appeals reversed that decision, and the Supreme Court then reversed the court of appeals, establishing a new, stricter legal standard for when a juror's failure to disclose information during voir dire warrants a new trial. The case was ultimately remanded for an evidentiary hearing under this new standard.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity