This document is an email chain from November 30 to December 1, 2020, between Assistant United States Attorneys (USANYS) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence details coordination with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MDC legal regarding a proposal, which was subsequently rejected by defense counsel members 'Bobbi' and 'Chris.' The chain concludes with the preparation of a draft letter and affidavit to be submitted to the court.
This document is an email chain from July 24, 2020, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at SDNY contacts OPR Counsel to discuss the 'universe of materials' OPR gathered during their review of the 2008 Non-prosecution Agreement between the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and Jeffrey Epstein. SDNY seeks this information to determine their discovery obligations in the recently filed case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an email chain from July 2021 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a CBP Task Force Officer regarding travel records for Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The CBP officer clarifies that outbound travel records between 1990 and 2000 were not recorded in the CBP database at that time, limiting the historical data available. The correspondence also notes that Maxwell has records under two name variations (with and without a space in her surname) and discusses cross-referencing these with an attached spreadsheet.
This document is an email chain dated May 10, 2019, originating from a Co-Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the SDNY. The email is addressed to Audrey Strauss and contains attachments regarding a revised status memo on Jeffrey Epstein intended for the ODAG (Office of the Deputy Attorney General).
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a request for a list of all 'Jeffrey Epstein-related FOIA lawsuits' to assist with a 'criminal discovery matter.' The chain confirms the existence of two specific cases: one involving the NY Times before Judge Engelmayer, and one involving Radar Online before Judge Gardephe (Case 17 Civ. 3956).
This document is a redacted email dated January 6, 2020, from an employee at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The subject line 'I have the Epstein team here' indicates a meeting or the presence of Jeffrey Epstein's associated team (likely legal representatives) at the SDNY office on that date.
An email chain between USANYS (Southern District of New York) staff on January 3, 2020, discussing an upcoming '60 Minutes' segment on Jeffrey Epstein's death. The staff confirms the segment exists via a website promo and notes that CBS (specifically Sarah Koch) had contacted them for a general meeting but had not requested specific comments regarding the segment.
This document is an email thread from July 2, 2020, within the Southern District of New York (SDNY) US Attorney's office. It follows the announcement of the indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell. A senior official (USANYS 8) forwards a press conference advisory to a team, congratulating them and calling them 'American heroes,' to which a team member responds, 'Thank you, sir!'
This document is a judgment from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. The United Kingdom, concerning the extradition of six terrorism suspects (including Abu Hamza) to the United States. The applicants argued that extradition would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the risk of solitary confinement at ADX Florence and the possibility of grossly disproportionate life sentences. The Court unanimously ruled that extradition would not violate Article 3, finding that conditions at ADX Florence and the potential sentences did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
This document is an email chain from January 31, 2020, between officials at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and likely main Justice Department offices. The discussion concerns the urgent administrative approval of a 'Sweden travel memo' related to the Epstein case (Subject: 'Epstein -- travel approval form'). The chain highlights bureaucratic delays involving the Office of International Affairs (OIA) and the need to forward the approved memo to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA).
This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, forwarding a 'Notice of Electronic Filing' from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The notice contains the text of an order by Judge J. Nathan granting a continuance of the trial until Fall 2021 to allow the defense time to prepare for additional charges in the S2 indictment. The order mandates that the parties meet and confer by May 10, 2021, to propose a specific trial start date.
An email dated May 3, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Mark Manley. The email forwards a court order related to a 'Third Party Letter' in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email chain from July 11, 2019, originating from Nicholas Biase of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) Public Affairs. The email notifies recipients that the 'Epstein Press Conference Video' is available online at a DOJ link. A respondent replies with 'Thanks' shortly after. Several recipients are redacted, but James Margolin (Contractor) is visible in the Cc line.
This document is an email chain dated July 8, 2019, between members of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) U.S. Attorney's Office. They are discussing the finalization of a 'Detention memo' for 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein), specifically noting substantive changes on pages 10-11 and coordinating its submission to the court.
This document is an internal email thread within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated December 20, 2019. It confirms that Judge Cote signed a '6(e) order' related to the Epstein case. The correspondence emphasizes strict security protocols (EOUSA secure shipping or encryption) for sending materials to an individual named John Langbein to prevent leaks.
This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated December 29, 2020. It discusses preparing a summary of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) for the incoming presidential transition team as one of the office's 'two most significant publicly filed criminal cases.' The document includes the drafted case summary detailing charges of facilitating sexual abuse of minors, perjury, and conspiracy.
This document is an internal email chain from May 2020 involving Assistant United States Attorney Rebekah Donaleski. The correspondence concerns the saving of 'Mark Epstein Emails' to a secure Department of Justice network folder specifically labeled 'InReEpsteinDeath-2019R01059', indicating an investigation related to Jeffrey Epstein's death. A colleague replies offering assistance after being 'out of the loop'.
This document is an internal email thread from December 2, 2019, between Assistant United States Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS). One attorney requests a 'pros memo/DP memo' (Prosecution Memorandum/Death Penalty Memorandum) regarding the 'MCC case,' likely referring to the legal proceedings following Jeffrey Epstein's death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. The reply includes an attachment titled 'MCC_Pros_Memo_v10.doc'.
This document is an internal email chain from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated April 14, 2021. The emails discuss and attach 'DP memos' (likely Deferred Prosecution memos) regarding 'Noel & Thomas,' referring to Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the correctional officers charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. The correspondence indicates the preparation and review of application materials and legal memos shortly before their deferred prosecution agreements were finalized.
This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves as a transmittal for discovery materials, specifically an additional photograph and a cover letter, which are being prepared on a drive for the client (Ghislaine Maxwell) to review at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
This document is an email chain from February to April 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) for the Southern District of New York and an unidentified attorney who successfully litigated *United States v. Nader*. The AUSA reached out to discuss a 'retroactivity issue' relevant to a current case. The final email, dated April 17, 2021, thanks the attorney for their help and attaches 'Maxwell_Opinion.pdf,' indicating the AUSA secured a favorable ruling in the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the consultation.
An email chain between officials at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 27, 2020. An Assistant United States Attorney requests 'the GPS from Maxwell' (likely referring to a General Pretrial Services report or similar legal document regarding Ghislaine Maxwell) to adapt it for another redacted individual. The recipient replies with an attachment titled 'Maxwell_GPS_Combo_v3.docx'.
An email chain from August 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the SDNY and staff at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The correspondence concerns the protocols and logistics for delivering a hard drive containing discovery materials to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell, including requirements for etching the drive, authorization memos, and password protection policies. The final email tracks the package, asking which carrier was used.
This document is an internal DOJ email chain from October 30, 2019, coordinating a response to an urgent request from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). ODAG required statistics regarding victim attendance and notification at the August 27, 2019, Epstein hearing to respond to a mandamus petition filed in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). USANYS officials discussed the number of victims present (17 present, 7 statements read by others) and the statements made by attorney Brad Edwards regarding clients who could not attend.
An email chain from late October 2019 between an Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and legal counsel for Mark Epstein. The correspondence reveals a scheduling conflict where a meeting was confirmed for October 28th, but Mark Epstein's lawyer believed it was for October 31st. The lawyer notes that Mark Epstein is 'quite anxious' and was 'flying in from Florida' for the anticipated meeting.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity