Leslie Groff
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08-21 | N/A | FBI agents served subpoena to Leslie Groff; Witness tampering incident occurred. | Home of Leslie Groff | View |
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, is a page from a court filing that argues about the scope of plea agreements. It discusses whether a plea agreement made with a U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) in one district can prevent prosecutions in other districts, citing several legal precedents like United States v. Alessi and United States v. Russo. The document uses Leslie Groff, an assistant to Epstein, as an example and analyzes factors such as whether other USAOs or the Department of Justice were involved in the negotiations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012132.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008, arguing that a new New York-based Grand Jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein violates his September 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the NPA protects associates like Leslie Groff and [Redacted], and asserts that the new investigation is a 'fishing expedition' lacking federal jurisdiction (internet luring, travel, etc.). The defense claims that statements from three principal accusers (names redacted) actually undermine the prosecution's case and deny essential elements required for federal charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013328.jpg
This document page outlines the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein starting in 2005 regarding the abuse of minors. It specifically details allegations of witness tampering, citing a 2007 incident where Epstein instructed his personal assistant, Leslie Groff, not to cooperate with FBI agents serving a subpoena at her home. The document also briefly mentions Donald Trump and Bill Clinton in the context of phone listings in an evidentiary journal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012138.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The letter argues that a new Grand Jury subpoena violates Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and asserts that the investigation in New York lacks the federal elements (internet luring, coercion, etc.) necessary for prosecution. The defense claims that three principal accusers (names redacted) have given sworn statements that contradict the prosecution's case.
FBI Presence
Groff informed Epstein FBI agents were at her home; Epstein instructed her not to speak to them.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity